Questionnaire Cattell: methodology for conducting tests and their interpretation. To help a psychologist: an example of a description of the analysis of the results of the Cattell test Results of the Cattell questionnaire

result:

The result of the test is a profile of your personality, built on the basis of 16 factors identified during the survey. Factors are measured in arbitrary units - "walls" - and distributed on a bipolar scale with extreme values ​​of 1 and 10 points. Accordingly, the first half of the scale (from 1 to 5.5) is assigned the “-” sign, the second half (from 5.5 to 10) is assigned the “+” sign. When interpreting, attention should be paid, first of all, to the “peaks” of the profile, that is, the lowest and highest values ​​of the factors in the profile (the corresponding parts of the text are in bold), in particular, to those indicators that in the “negative” pole are in the range from 1 to 3 walls, and in the "positive" - ​​from 8 to 10 walls.

Profile of your personality

Socio-psychological features

Independence of character, a tendency to dominance, authoritarianism, alertness towards people, opposing oneself to a group, a tendency to leadership, a developed sense of responsibility and duty, acceptance of rules and norms, independence in decision-making, initiative, activity in social spheres, flexibility and diplomacy in interpersonal communication, the ability to find non-trivial solutions in practical, everyday situations.

Interpretation of Primary Factors

. Factor A("isolation - sociability") = 6 (A+)

A low value (A−) is characterized by: secrecy, isolation, alienation, incredulity, lack of sociability, isolation, criticality, a tendency to objectivity, rigidity, to excessive severity in assessing people. Difficulties in establishing interpersonal, direct contacts

A high value (A +) is characterized by: sociability, openness, naturalness, ease, willingness to cooperate, adaptability, attention to people, willingness to work together, activity in eliminating conflicts in a group, willingness to go on about. Ease in establishing direct, interpersonal contacts

Pole A- in the technical name is called sizothymia (from the Greek root, σχίζω - I split). Pole A + is called affectothymia, and it characterizes the intense expression of affects (feelings). Emotionally "sluggish", "dry" personality tends to be careful when expressing feelings, it is not very expressive. The most striking feature of affectothymia is good nature, cheerfulness, interest in people, emotional susceptibility.

In general, factor A is focused on measuring a person's sociability in small groups and the ability to establish direct, interpersonal contacts.

In the answers to the questionnaire, a person with A+ prefers working with people, social approval, likes to keep up with the times. Personality with pole A - loves ideas, prefers to work alone. There is evidence that individuals with A+ are sociable, can be leaders in small groups, and often choose to work with people; individuals with the A– pole can be artists, research scientists and prefer to work independently, in isolation from the group.

Result 1-3 Wall - Prone to rigidity, coldness, skepticism and aloofness. Things attract him more than people. Prefers to work on his own, avoiding compromise. Prone to accuracy, rigidity in activities, personal attitudes. This is desirable in many professions. Sometimes he tends to be critical, inflexible, hard, tough.

Result 4 wall - restrained, detached, critical, cold (schizothymia).

The result of 7 walls is outward-facing, easy-going, engaging affectively (cyclothymia).

The result of 8-10 walls is a tendency to good nature, ease of communication, emotional expression; ready for cooperation, attentive to people, soft-hearted, kind, adaptable. Prefers those activities where there are activities with people, situations with social significance. This person is easily included in active groups. He is generous in personal relationships, not afraid of criticism. Well remembers events, surnames, names and patronymics.

. Factor B(intelligence) = 4 (B−)

A low value (B−) is characterized by: concreteness and some rigidity of thinking, difficulties in solving abstract problems, reduced efficiency of thinking, insufficient level of general verbal culture.

A high value (B+) is characterized by: developed abstract thinking, efficiency, ingenuity, fast learning. A fairly high level of general culture, especially verbal.

Factor B does not determine the level of intelligence, it is focused on measuring the efficiency of thinking and the general level of verbal culture and erudition. It should be noted that low scores for this factor may depend on other personality characteristics: anxiety, frustration, low educational qualifications. And most importantly, factor B is perhaps the only factor of the methodology that is not strictly validated. Therefore, the results for this factor are indicative.

Result 1-3 wall - tends to understand the material more slowly when learning. "Dumb", prefers a specific, literal interpretation. His "dumbness" either reflects low intelligence, or is a consequence of a decrease in functions as a result of psychopathology.

Result 4 wall - less intellectually developed, thinks concretely (less ability to learn).

The result of 7 walls is more intellectually developed, abstract thinking, reasonable (high learning ability).

The result of 8-10 walls - quickly perceives and assimilates new educational material. There is some correlation with the cultural level, as well as with reactivity. High scores indicate the absence of a decrease in the functions of the intellect in pathological conditions.

. Factor C("emotional instability - emotional stability") = 4 (C−)

A low value (C−) is characterized by: emotional instability, impulsiveness; a person is under the influence of feelings, changeable in moods, easily upset, unstable in interests. Low tolerance for frustration, irritability, fatigue.

A high value (C+) is characterized by: emotional stability, endurance; a person is emotionally mature, calm, stable in interests, efficient, can be rigid, oriented to reality.

This factor characterizes the dynamic generalization and maturity of emotions as opposed to unregulated emotionality. Psychoanalysts have tried to describe this factor as ego-strength and ego-weakness. According to Cattell's methodology, a person with a C- pole is easily irritated by certain events or people, is not satisfied with life situations, his own health, in addition, this person is weak-willed. However, this interpretation is quite orthodox, since it does not take into account the plasticity of the emotional sphere. People with a high score on the C+ factor are more likely to be leaders than those whose scores on this factor are closer to the C- pole. On the other hand, for the management team, the range of indicators for factor C is wide; some of them have low values ​​for this factor (perhaps, the reaction of fatigue and anxiety under stress have an effect here).

It has been established that people with high and medium scores on factor C are also characterized by higher moral qualities.

In general, the factor has a genetic origin and aims to measure emotional stability; it correlates to a large extent with the concepts of a weak and strong nervous system (according to I.P. Pavlov).

Professions that require overcoming stressful situations (managers, pilots, rescuers, etc.) should be owned by individuals with high scores on factor C. At the same time, in professions where quick decision-making is not required, emotional stability and where it is possible to resolve the issue yourself (artists, postmen, etc.), you can have low marks for this factor.

Result 1-3 wall - there is a low threshold in relation to frustration, changeable and plastic, avoiding the requirements of reality, neurotically fatigued, irritable, emotionally excitable, having neurotic symptoms (phobias, sleep disturbances, psychosomatic disorders). A low threshold is characteristic of all forms of neurotic and some mental disorders.

Result 4 wall - sensitive, emotionally less stable, easily upset.

The result of 7 walls is emotionally stable, soberly assessing reality, active, mature.

The result of 8-10 walls is emotionally mature, stable, unflappable. High ability to comply with social moral norms. Sometimes humble resignation to unresolved emotional issues. A good level of "C" allows you to adapt even with mental disorders.

. E factor("subordination - dominance") = 5 (E−)

A low value (E−) is characterized by: softness, compliance, tact, meekness, courtesy, dependence, resignation, helpfulness, respectfulness, shyness, willingness to take the blame, modesty, expressiveness, a tendency to easily get out of balance.

A high value (E +) is characterized by: independence, independence, perseverance, stubbornness, assertiveness, willfulness, sometimes conflict, aggressiveness, refusal to recognize external power, a tendency to authoritarian behavior, a thirst for admiration, a rebel.

Factor E does not significantly correlate with leadership achievement, but is associated with social status and is higher for leaders than for followers. There is an assumption that the estimates for this factor change with age and depend on the gender of the subject. In their behavior, people with high scores (on this factor) experience a need for autonomy.

Result 1-3 wall - yielding to others, submissive. Often dependent, admits his guilt. Strives for obsessive observance of correctness, rules. This passivity is part of many neurotic syndromes.

Result 4 wall - modest, submissive, soft, compliant, supple, conformal, adaptable.

The result of 7 walls is self-affirming, independent, aggressive, stubborn (dominant).

The result of 8-10 walls - asserting himself, his "I", self-confident, independently thinking. Inclined to asceticism, guided by his own rules of conduct, hostile and extrapunitive (authoritarian), commands others, does not recognize authorities.

. F factor("restraint - expressiveness") = 3 (F−)

A low value (F−) is characterized by: prudence, caution, prudence in choosing a communication partner. A tendency to concern, worry about the future, pessimism in the perception of reality, restraint in the manifestation of emotions.

A high value (F+) is characterized by: cheerfulness, impulsiveness, enthusiasm, carelessness, recklessness in choosing communication partners, emotional significance of social contacts, expressiveness, expansiveness, emotional brightness in relationships between people, communication dynamism, which involves emotional leadership in groups

This factor is a component of the second-order factors of various personality traits. An interesting fact is that over the years, the manifestation of impulsivity and carelessness gradually decreases, which can be considered as evidence of a certain emotional maturity.

In general, factor F is focused on measuring emotional coloring and dynamism in communication processes. Example: actors, effective leaders have higher ratings, artists, followers have lower ones.

Result 1-3 wall - unhurried, restrained. Sometimes gloomy, pessimistic, prudent. It is considered a very accurate, sober, reliable person.

Result 4 wall - sober, cautious, serious, silent;

The result of 7 walls is careless, impulsively lively, cheerful, full of enthusiasm.

The result of 8-10 walls is cheerful, active, talkative, carefree, can be impulsive.

. G factor(“low normativity of behavior – high normativity of behavior”) = 5 (G−)

A low value (G−) is characterized by: a tendency to inconstancy, susceptibility to the influence of feelings, chance and circumstances. Indulges his desires, does not make efforts to fulfill group requirements and norms. Disorganization, irresponsibility, impulsiveness, lack of agreement with generally accepted moral rules and standards, flexibility in relation to social norms, freedom from their influence, sometimes unscrupulousness and a tendency to antisocial behavior.

A high value (G +) is characterized by: conscientiousness, responsibility, stability, balance, perseverance, a tendency to moralize, reasonableness, conscientiousness. Developed sense of duty and responsibility, conscious observance of generally accepted moral rules and norms, perseverance in achieving goals, business orientation.

This factor resembles factor C, especially in regard to the role of self-regulation of behavior and attitudes towards other people. This factor characterizes the features of the emotional-volitional sphere (persistence, organization - irresponsibility, disorganization) and the features of the regulation of social behavior (acceptance or ignorance of generally accepted moral rules and norms). Psychoanalysts interpret this factor as a high superego and a low superego. The researcher should be especially careful when analyzing low scores for this factor (G-), since there is no direct correlation between low scores and pronounced antisocial behavior (for example, with criminals). On the contrary, it is known that many people who do not perceive "morality of the middle class", "intellectuals", "emancipated individuals", persons expressing humanistic ideals and flexible attitude to social and cultural traditions, may have low scores on this factor.

High scores can often characterize not only strong-willed personality traits, but also a tendency to cooperate and conformism.

Result 1-3 wall - a tendency to inconstancy of purpose, laid-back in behavior, does not make efforts to fulfill group tasks, fulfill social and cultural requirements. His freedom from the influence of the group may lead to antisocial acts, but at times makes his activity more effective. Refusal to obey the rules reduces somatic disorders under stress.

Result 4 wall - taking advantage of the moment, looking for benefits in the situation. Avoids rules, feels unobligatory.

The result of 7 walls is conscious, persistent, you can rely on it, sedate, obligatory.

Result 8-10 walls - demanding of himself, guided by a sense of duty, persistent, takes responsibility, conscientious, prone to moralizing, prefers hard-working people, witty.

. H factor("timidity - courage") = 4 (H−)

A low value (H−) is characterized by: timidity, shyness, emotional restraint, caution, social passivity, delicacy, attentiveness to others, increased sensitivity to threat, preference for an individual style of activity and communication in a small group (2-3 people).

A high value (H+) is characterized by: courage, enterprise, activity; a person has emotional interests, a willingness to take risks and cooperate with strangers in unfamiliar circumstances, the ability to make independent, extraordinary decisions, a propensity for adventurism and the manifestation of leadership qualities.

Factor H is a well-defined factor that characterizes the degree of activity in social contacts. It should be taken into account that this factor has a genetic origin and reflects the activity of the organism and the characteristics of temperament. People with high ratings of this factor have a penchant for risky professions (test pilots), are stubborn, sociable, able to withstand emotional stress, which often makes them leaders.

Low estimates of this factor characterize people who are shy, timid, not social, and difficult to make independent decisions.

Result 1-3 wall - shy, evasive, keeps aloof, "stewed". Usually feels a sense of insufficiency. Speech is slow, difficult, difficult to express. Avoids professions associated with personal contacts. He prefers to have 1-2 close friends, is not inclined to delve into everything that happens around him.

Result 4 wall - shy, reserved, insecure, fearful, timid.

The result of 7 walls is adventurous, socially bold, uninhibited, spontaneous.

The result of 8-10 walls is sociable, courageous, trying new things; spontaneous and lively in the emotional sphere. His "thick skin" allows him to endure complaints and tears, difficulties in communicating with people in emotionally intense situations. May be careless about details, not responding to danger signals.

. Factor I("rigidity - sensitivity") = 6 (I+)

A low value (I−) is characterized by: unsentimentality, self-confidence, severity, rationality, flexibility in judgment, practicality, sometimes some rigidity and callousness in relation to others, rationality, logic.

A high value (I+) is characterized by: sensitivity, impressionability, richness of emotional experiences, a tendency to romanticism, artistic perception of the world, developed aesthetic interests, artistry, femininity, a tendency to empathy, sympathy, empathy and understanding of other people, refined emotionality.

According to a number of studies, people with high scores on this factor tend to be romantically inclined, love travel and new experiences. They have a developed imagination, aesthetics are important to them.

This factor reflects differences in the cultural level and aesthetic susceptibility of the individual. An interesting fact is that people with low scores on this factor get sick less, are more aggressive, play sports more often, and are athletic.

The characteristics of this factor are closer to the second-order factor "low emotionality - high emotionality"; this factor is dominant.

A person with high scores on this factor is characterized as physically and mentally refined, prone to reflection, thinking about his mistakes and ways to avoid them.

It should be noted that the estimates for this factor in women are higher than in men, while they depend on the surrounding conditions and cultural level. Cattell defines this personality trait as "programmed emotional sensitivity", thereby emphasizing the prerogative of the genetic origin of this personality trait. It should be noted that men with high marks most often belong to the artistic type of personality. By occupation, high marks for this factor unite artists, actors, musicians, writers, diagnosticians and psychiatrists, and lawyers. Persons with I- are more prone to neurotic mismatches (in the study of the Eysenck test, these people have high scores on such a characteristic as neuroticism). In general, this factor determines the degree of emotional sophistication of the individual.

Outcome 1-3 Sten is practical, realistic, courageous, independent, has a sense of responsibility, but is skeptical about the subjective and cultural aspects of life. Sometimes ruthless, cruel, smug. Leading the group makes it work on a practical and realistic basis.

Result 4 wall - strong, independent, self-reliant, realistic, does not tolerate meaninglessness.

The result of 7 walls is weak, dependent, insufficiently independent, helpless, sensitive.

The result of 8-10 walls is weak, dreamy, choosy, capricious, feminine, sometimes demanding attention, help, dependent, impractical. Dislikes rough people and rough professions. Tends to slow down the activity of the group and violate its morale by unrealistic digging into the little things, the details.

. Factor L("gullibility - suspicion") = 3 (L−)

A low value (L−) is characterized by: openness, accommodating, tolerance, complaisance; freedom from envy, compliance. There may be a sense of insignificance.

A high value (L+) is characterized by: caution, self-centeredness, alertness towards people; a tendency to jealousy, the desire to lay responsibility for mistakes on others, irritability. Sometimes autonomy, independence and independence in social behavior.

Cattell named this factor alaxia (L-) - protensia (L+). The term protensia means "protection" and "internal tension"; high scores on this factor may correlate with neurotic characteristics. At the same time, high scores on this factor are often found among people of independent behavior, among those who, by occupation, are associated with the creation of something, for example, in the field of religion and science. A number of character traits that are attributed to dominance (factor E) should in fact be associated with this factor. Pole L- characterizes a person who is good-natured, open and, perhaps, without ambition and striving for victory.

In general, the factor L reflects the emotional attitude towards people. Very high scores for this factor indicate excessive protection and emotional tension, frustration of the individual. The low pole (L-) characterizes a person who is good-natured, but prone to conformism.

Result 1-3 wall - prone to freedom from jealousy tendencies, adaptable, cheerful, does not seek competition, cares about others. Works well in a group.

Result 4 wall - trusting, adaptable, not jealous, accommodating.

The result of 7 walls is suspicious, has its own opinion, is not deceitful.

The result of 8-10 walls is distrustful, doubting, often immersed in one's "I", stubborn, interested in the inner mental life. Cautious in actions, cares little about other people, does not work well in a group. This factor does not necessarily indicate paranoia.

. M factor("practicality - daydreaming") = 7 (M+)

A low value (M−) is characterized by: high speed of solving practical problems, prosaicness, orientation to external reality, developed concrete imagination, practicality, realism.

A high value (M+) is characterized by: a rich imagination, preoccupation with one’s ideas, internal illusions (“hovering in the clouds”), ease of rejection of practical judgments, the ability to operate with abstract concepts, focus on one’s inner world; daydreaming.

The picture of this factor is quite complex. In general, individuals with M+ have a vibrant inner intellectual life, with intense living of ideas and feelings. In behavior they can be "bohemian", non-conformal. Artists, poets, researchers, experimenters, high-ranking leaders, editors, etc. have high marks for this factor. Persons engaged in mechanical calculations, where attention and concentration are needed, have low marks. It has also been noted that people with low scores on this factor are less likely to get into car accidents. They are characterized by balance and sanity. However, in unexpected situations, they often lack imagination and resourcefulness.

In general, the factor is focused on measuring the features of the imagination that are reflected in the real behavior of the individual, such as practicality, earthliness, or, conversely, some "head in the clouds", a romantic attitude to life.

Result 1-3 Wall - Worries about doing the right thing, practical, guided by the possible, cares about details, retains presence of mind in extreme situations, but sometimes retains imagination.

The result of the 4th wall is practical, thorough, conventional. We manage external real circumstances.

The result of 7 walls is a person with a developed imagination, immersed in inner needs, taking care of practical matters. Bohemian.

Result 8-10 walls - prone to unpleasant behavior for others (not everyday), unconventional, does not worry about everyday things, self-motivated, has a creative imagination. Pays attention to the "basic" and forgets about specific people and realities. Interests directed from within sometimes lead to unrealistic situations accompanied by expressive outbursts. Individuality leads to its rejection in group activity.

. N factor("straightforwardness - diplomacy") = 5 (N−)

A low value (N−) is characterized by: frankness, simplicity, naivety, straightforwardness, tactlessness, naturalness, spontaneity, emotionality, indiscipline, inability to analyze the motives of a partner, lack of insight, simplicity of tastes, contentment with what is available.

A high value (N+) is characterized by: sophistication, the ability to behave in society, diplomacy in communication, emotional restraint, insight, caution, cunning, aesthetic sophistication, sometimes unreliability, the ability to find a way out of difficult situations, prudence.

The factor is focused on measuring the relationship of the individual to people and the surrounding reality. So far, this factor has not been sufficiently studied. However, we can say that the factor characterizes a certain form of tactical skill of the individual (the factor positively correlates with mental abilities and dominance and with a certain self-doubt of the individual). High scores on this factor characterize diplomats as opposed to a "natural and straightforward" person with naive emotional sincerity, directness and ease. Cattell characterized people with high scores on the N factor as follows: "They can be either Socrates or a smart boy, and people with a low pole are distinguished by expressiveness, warmth and kindness."

There is evidence that people with low scores on this factor inspire more trust and sympathy, especially among children. People with high marks can be described as intelligent, independent, with a complex nature. In subcultural studies, a connection was found between high scores on this factor and the ability to survive and a certain sophistication. In terms of dynamic characteristics, people with high scores are leaders in analytical, purposeful discussion and in the formation of functional group decisions (theatrical directors, film directors, diplomats, as a rule, have high marks for this factor).

People with a low score on the N factor are slow, conservative, and prevent the group from making a decision.

Cattell figuratively called the positive pole the Machiavelli pole, and the negative pole the Rousseau pole.

Result 1-3 wall - tends to lack sophistication, to sentimentality and simplicity. Sometimes rude and harsh, usually natural and spontaneous.

Result 4 wall - direct, natural, unsophisticated, sentimental.

The result of 7 walls is cunning, sloppy, worldly, insightful (refined).

The result of 8-10 walls is refined, experienced, secular, cunning. Prone to analysis. An intellectual approach to assessing the situation, close to cynicism.

. O factor("calmness - anxiety") = 9 (O+)

A low value (O−) is characterized by: carelessness, arrogance, cheerfulness, self-confidence and self-confidence, serenity, fearlessness, composure, calmness, lack of remorse and guilt.

A high value (O+) is characterized by: anxiety, preoccupation, vulnerability, hypochondria, susceptibility to mood, fear, self-doubt, a tendency to premonitions, self-flagellation, depression, sensitivity to the approval of others, guilt and dissatisfaction with oneself.

Previously, when interpreting this factor, such terms as "depressive tendency", "bad mood", "self-abasement" and even "neurotic state" were used. Low scores are characteristic of people who "manage their failures." A person with high marks for this factor feels his instability, tension in difficult life situations, easily loses his presence of mind, is full of regrets and compassion; it is characterized by a combination of symptoms of hypochondria and neurasthenia with a predominance of fears. This factor is broader than guilt in the conventional sense. The stability component is also important in this factor; people with high scores are often shy, it is difficult for them to make contact with other people.

Low scores on this factor characterize those people who can cope with their failures, in contrast to those who experience failures as an internal conflict. There is evidence that antisocial individuals do not suffer from feelings of guilt.

By occupation, religious persons, artists, actors, and writers are highly rated for this factor. High scores largely determine successful leadership in difficult situations and a person's desire for self-actualization. At the same time, these assessments are characteristic of neurotics, alcoholics and people with certain types of psychopathy. Cattell believes that this factor can, within certain limits, be called the factor of Hamlet, and it can have a social and moral significance, which Dostoevsky's admirers intuitively feel. It should be borne in mind that high scores for this factor may have a situational origin.

Result 1-3 wall - serene, with a calm mood, it is difficult to piss him off, unperturbed. Confident in himself and his abilities. Flexible, does not feel threatened, sometimes to the point that he is not sensitive to the fact that the group is going a different way and that he can cause dislike.

Result 4 wall - serene, trusting, calm.

The result of 7 walls is anxious, depressive, worried (tendency of autopunitiveness), guilt.

The result of 8-10 walls is depressive, bad mood prevails, gloomy forebodings and reflections, anxiety. Tendency to become anxious in difficult situations. Feeling not accepted by the group. A high score is common in clinical groups of all types.

. Factor Q1("conservatism - radicalism") = 5 (Q1−)

A low value (Q1−) is characterized by: conservatism, resistance to traditions, doubt in relation to new ideas and principles, a tendency to moralize and moralize, resistance to change, narrowness of intellectual interests, orientation to specific real activity.

A high value (Q1+) is characterized by: free-thinking, experimentation, the presence of intellectual interests, developed analytical thinking, susceptibility to change, to new ideas, distrust of authorities, refusal to take anything on faith, focus on analytical, theoretical activity.

Studies have shown that individuals with high scores on this factor are better informed, less prone to moralizing, express more interest in science than in dogma. Moreover, they are ready to break habits and established traditions, they are characterized by independence of judgments, views and behavior.

The factor determines the radical, intellectual, political and religious attitudes.

High marks for this factor are observed among managers, administrators, scientists, university teachers, and especially among researchers and theorists. Low - among low-skilled specialists and service personnel (nannies, nurses, etc.).

There is an assumption that this factor has a genetic origin and in everyday consciousness correlates with such human characteristics as “smart” (Q1+) and “stupid” (Q1-). It is noteworthy that business leaders have high marks for this factor.

In the behavioral diagram, a person with low scores on this factor is characterized as a “conservative”, with high scores as a “radical”.

Outcome 1-3 wall - convinced of the correctness of what he was taught, and accepts everything as verified, despite the contradictions. Prone to caution and compromise with new people. Tends to obstruct and resist change and delay it, sticks to tradition.

Result 4 wall - conservative, respectful of principles, tolerant of traditional difficulties.

The result of 7 walls is experimental, critical, liberal, analytical, free-thinking.

Result 8-10 walls - absorbed in intellectual issues, has doubts about various fundamental issues. He is skeptical and tries to get to the bottom of ideas old and new. He is often better informed, less inclined to moralize, more to experiment in life, tolerant of inconsistencies and changes.

. Factor Q2("conformism - non-conformism") = 6 (Q2+)

A low value (Q2−) is characterized by: dependence on the opinions and requirements of the group, sociability, following public opinion, the desire to work and make decisions together with other people, low independence, orientation towards social approval.

A high value (Q2+) is characterized by: independence, orientation to one's own decisions, independence, resourcefulness, desire to have one's own opinion. With extreme high scores, the tendency to oppose oneself to the group and the desire to dominate it.

Low scores on this factor are sociable individuals, for whom the approval of society means a lot, these are secular people. High marks are given to people who are often disconnected from the group and are individualists by occupation - writers, scientists and criminals!

This factor is central to the second-order dependency-independence factor.

It should be especially taken into account that the indicators for this factor can characterize a certain sociability of the individual and have a constant connection with the criteria of real life.

In essence, Cattell believes that this factor is "thinking introversion" and both family and social traditions play a significant role in the formation of such a model of behavior. Such people are characterized by a rather high degree of awareness in choosing a line of behavior.

Result 1-3 wall - prefers to work and make decisions together with other people, loves communication and admiration, depends on them. Inclined to go with a group. Not necessarily sociable, rather he needs support from the group.

Result 4 wall - dependent on the group, "joining", led, going to the call (group dependence).

The result of 7 walls is self-satisfied, offering his own solution, enterprising.

The result of 8-10 walls is independent, inclined to go his own way, make his own decisions, act independently. He does not consider public opinion, but does not necessarily play a dominant role in relation to others (see factor E). It cannot be assumed that he does not like people, he simply does not need their consent and support.

. Factor Q3(“low self-control – high self-control”) = 5 (Q3−)

A low value (Q3−) is characterized by: low discipline, follows one's desires, dependence on moods, inability to control one's emotions and behavior.

A high value (Q3+) is characterized by: purposefulness, strong will, ability to control one's emotions and behavior.

Low scores on this factor indicate weak will and poor self-control. The activity of such people is disordered and impulsive. A person with high scores on this factor has socially approved characteristics: self-control, perseverance, conscientiousness, and a tendency to observe etiquette. In order to meet such standards, the individual requires the application of certain efforts, the presence of clear principles, beliefs and consideration of public opinion.

This factor measures the level of internal control of behavior, the integration of the individual.

People with high marks for this factor are prone to organizational activities and achieve success in those professions that require objectivity, determination, balance. The factor characterizes a person's awareness in regulating the power of the "I" (factor C) and the power of the "super-I" (factor G) and determines the severity of the volitional characteristics of the individual. This factor is one of the most important for predicting the success of the activity. It is positively associated with the frequency of leadership selection and the degree of activity in solving group problems.

Result 1-3 wall - not guided by volitional control, does not pay attention to social requirements, is inattentive to others. May feel inadequate.

Result 4 wall - internally undisciplined, conflict (low integration).

The result of 7 walls is controlled, socially accurate, following the "I"-image (high integration).

The result of 8-10 walls - tends to have a strong control of their emotions and general behavior. Socially attentive and thorough; exhibits what is commonly referred to as "self-respect" and concern for social reputation. Sometimes, however, it tends to be stubborn.

. Factor Q4("relaxation - tension") = 6 (Q4+)

A low value (Q4−) is characterized by: relaxation, lethargy, apathy, calmness, low motivation, excessive satisfaction, equanimity.

A high value (Q4+) is characterized by: composure, energy, tension, frustration, increased motivation, anxiety, agitation, irritability.

A high score is interpreted as an energetic excitation that requires a certain discharge; sometimes this condition can turn into a psychosomatic disorder: emotional stability decreases, balance is disturbed, aggressiveness may appear. Such people rarely become leaders.

Studies have shown that a low score (0-5 points) is typical for people with a low level of achievement motivation, content with what they have. Persons with values ​​of this factor from 5 to 8 points are characterized by optimal emotional tone and stress resistance.

Result 1-3 wall - prone to relaxation, balance, satisfaction. In some situations, his oversatisfaction can lead to laziness, to the achievement of low results. On the contrary, a high level of stress can interfere with the effectiveness of study or work.

Result 4 wall - relaxed (not tense), not frustrated.

The result of 7 walls is tense, frustrated, motivated, hyper-reactive (high energy stress).

The result of 8-10 walls is prone to tension, excitability.

Interpretation of secondary factors

. Factor F1(“low anxiety – high anxiety”) = 6.9 (F1+)

A low value (F1−) is typical: in general, this person is satisfied with what he has and can achieve what he thinks is important. However, very low scores may indicate a lack of motivation in difficult situations.

A high value (F1+) is characterized by: a high level of anxiety in its usual sense. Anxiety is not necessarily neurotic, as it can be situationally conditioned. However, in some ways it has incapacity, because a person is dissatisfied to a degree that does not allow him to fulfill the requirements and achieve what he wants. Very high anxiety usually interferes with productivity and leads to physical disorders.

. Factor F2("introversion - extraversion") = 3.6 (F2−)

A low value (F2−) is characterized by: a tendency to dryness, to self-satisfaction, frozen interpersonal contacts. This can be beneficial in work that requires precision.

A high value (F2 +) is characterized by: social contact, uninhibited, successfully establishes and maintains interpersonal relationships. This can be a very favorable moment in situations requiring this type of temperament. This feature should always be considered a favorable prognosis in activities, for example, in studies.

. Factor F3("sensitivity - balance") = 3.7 (F3−)

A low value (F3−) is characterized by: a tendency to experience difficulties due to the emotionality that manifests itself in everything. These people may be dissatisfied and frustrated. However, there is a sensitivity to the nuances of life. There are probably artistic inclinations and softness. If such a person has a problem, then it takes a lot of thought to resolve it before taking action.

A high value (F3 +) is characterized by: an enterprising, decisive and flexible personality. This person tends to ignore the nuances of life, directing his behavior to be too obvious and obvious. If difficulties arise, they cause rapid action without sufficient thought.

. Factor F4("conformity - independence") = 5.7 (F4+)

A low value (F4−) is characterized by: a group-dependent, passive person who needs the support of other people and orients his behavior in the direction of the people who provide such support.

A high value (F4 +) is characterized by: aggressive, independent, courageous, sharp personality. Tries to choose situations where such behavior is at least tolerated. Shows great initiative.

Validity scales

In addition to the primary personality factors of the questionnaire, two indicators are usually calculated that reflect attitudes towards testing (validity scales):
1) the desire to look in a favorable light - the MD scale,
2) the desire to look worse than it actually is - the FB scale.

MD scale was designed to identify instances where subjects attempt to create an overly favorable self-image. If the MD score is high, there are several hypotheses that need to be tested:
1. This may indicate that the subject deliberately manipulates the test results (for example, when applying for a job).
2. A high score on the MD scale can be obtained by subjects who are very worried about how they look in the eyes of others. In interviews, they usually acknowledge this fact, but at the same time claim that they answered the questions sincerely.
3. Sometimes people score high on the MD scale even though they don't skew the results. For example, this is typical for people entering religious service.

FB scale was designed to identify subjects who were excessively saddened and preoccupied with their failures, real or imagined. The two most common situations in which the FB score is high are:
1. A person seeks to emphasize his psychological maladjustment in order to receive psychological assistance.
2. Emphasizing one's failures and inadequacy can be caused by real depression or other serious disorders.

Interpretation of Pair Combinations of Primary Factors

When interpreting the results obtained, it is advisable to use not only the severity of individual factors, but also their combinations, which form symptom complexes of communicative, intellectual, emotional and regulatory personality traits. In this case, one should take into account not only the pole values ​​of the factors, but also the average ones, which are quite often encountered in the practice of a psychologist.

The group of communicative properties is formed by the following factors:

A - sociability
N - courage
E - dominance
L - suspicion
N - diplomacy
Q2 - independence.

The combination of factors A and H reflects the individual's need for communication, the ability to communicate.

High values ​​of factors A (8-10 walls) and H (8-10 walls) mean that a person strives for communication, easily and quickly, often on his own initiative, comes into contact with strangers and unfamiliar people. The experience of interpersonal communication is great, but often the relationship is superficial and short-lived. Does not experience stress in a large audience. Maintains self-confidence, is able to defend his position when dealing with authoritative people. Communication is the main way to solve all your problems.

The average values ​​of factors A (4-7 walls) and H (4-7 walls) characterize a person who does not avoid relationships with people, but his own activity in establishing and maintaining contacts is low. He becomes the initiator of communication if his interests are affected or the problem is solved only through communication. Selective in communication; has a small circle of friends and acquaintances who are close in interests and value orientations and with whom he feels comfortable. Communication with a large audience or people of authority requires overcoming tension.

Low values ​​of factors A (wall 1-3) and H (wall 1-3) are inherent in a person who has a weakly expressed need to communicate with people. Extremely selective in establishing and maintaining contacts. The social circle is limited to friends and relatives. Avoids communication with a large audience and authorities. Experiencing great difficulty when there are difficulties associated with requests.

The combination of factors L and N characterizes the attitude of the individual towards other people.

High values ​​of the factors L (8-10 walls) and N (8-10 walls) are characteristic of a person who is distinguished by pronounced social insight. He clearly sees the hidden meaning of everyday situations, interpersonal relationships. Understands people, the motives of their behavior and experiences. He subtly feels the attitude of other people towards himself, and this allows him to quickly change the style and distance of communication if the communicative situation changes. In conflict situations, seeks to avoid "sharp corners", looking for compromise solutions. At the same time, he is wary, internally tense and may experience anxiety in relationships with people. Often judges people with prejudice.

The average values ​​of the factors L (4-7 walls) and N (4-7 walls) reflect the ability of a person to understand people quite subtly, to think about the motives of their behavior. However, such a person rarely focuses on his assessments and characteristics. He treats people kindly, but without much confidence. Establishes trusting relationships with those who are close in interests, with whom they maintain long-term relationships. He understands other people's problems, but prefers to keep his own problems a secret and solve them on his own. Conflicts and disagreements with others are possible, but they are not long-lasting.

Low values ​​of the factors L (1-3 wall) and N (1-3 wall) belong to a person who is natural in behavior. Benevolently, without prejudice, treats other people, condescendingly evaluates their actions. However, it can offend due to an inaccurate understanding of the state of the interlocutor, the motives of his behavior, or due to insufficient insight into the essence of the situation. Rarely feels the nuances of communication, maintains the style and distance of communication, regardless of changes in the communicative situation.

The combination of factors E and Q2 reflects some aspects of the leadership potential of the individual.

High values ​​of factors E (8-10 walls) and Q2 (8-10 walls) are characteristic of a person who actively seeks to take a leadership position in a group. He has his own point of view on many issues. Seeks to approve it among others and change their behavior in accordance with their own vision and understanding of the situation. The opinion of others is critical, resorting to it rarely. Prefers independent decisions that do not change even under pressure from the group.

The average values ​​of the factors E (4-7 walls) and Q2 (4-7 walls) indicate a moderately pronounced leadership potential of the individual. Existing own point of view on many issues is not imposed on the group. Leadership functions are manifested mainly in familiar situations, the development of which can be foreseen, and the appearance of difficulties can be prevented. Leadership activity is also possible when the situation deeply affects personal interests. He respects the opinion of the group as well as his own. He takes it into account, can change his own under the pressure of the group. However, he prefers to make responsible decisions on his own.

Low values ​​of factors E (1-3 wall) and Q2 (1-3 wall) indicate low leadership potential. A person does not seek to take a leading position among the surrounding people or in a group. Prefers to obey. Easily agrees with the opinions of others, quickly changes his own point of view. Tends to avoid situations requiring own responsibility for decision making. Experiences tension when it is necessary to independently overcome obstacles on the way to achieving the goal.

The group of intellectual properties includes the following factors:

B - intelligence
M - daydreaming
N - diplomacy
Q1 - susceptibility to the new.

The combination of factors B and M characterizes the intellectual capabilities of the individual.

High values ​​of factors B (8-10 walls) and M (8-10 walls) mean high intellectual abilities, passion for abstract ideas. Easily solves abstract problems, quickly establishes cause-and-effect relationships between phenomena. Has a rich imagination, developed figurative thinking. At the same time, thinking is logical and has a high level of generalization.

The average values ​​of factors B (4-7 walls) and M (4-7 walls) reflect the possibility of achieving success in solving simple abstract problems. The greatest success is achieved in solving practical problems. A person is capable of creative, detailed development of ideas put forward by others.

Low values ​​of factors B (wall 1-3) and M (wall 1-3) characterize the predominance of specific, practically oriented thinking in the structure of the intellect. When making decisions, he focuses mainly on common sense and facts. Solving abstract problems requires additional effort and time.

The combination of factors N and Q1 reflect the flexibility and efficiency of thinking of the individual.

High values ​​of the factors N (8-10 walls) and Q1 (8-10 walls) indicate the flexibility of thinking and the speed of decision-making. A person easily penetrates the meaning of a problem situation, quickly calculates possible solutions and finds the optimal one. Inclined to experiment with objects, ideas. In decisions, he focuses on new approaches, is not afraid of mistakes and miscalculations.

The average values ​​of factors N (4-7 walls) and Q1 (4-7 walls) are found in people who tend to quickly navigate in problem situations, but who are not always able to calculate solutions. In this regard, the chosen solution is not always optimal. New ideas and solutions are used in a balanced way, only after a comprehensive assessment and evaluation of the consequences.

Low values ​​of the factors N (1-3 wall) and Q1 (1-3 wall) are recorded in those who have difficulty orienting themselves in problem situations. Understanding the meaning of the problem situation, the choice of solutions require additional intellectual effort and time. Attitude towards new ideas is wary. When solving life problems, methods and techniques proven by experience are used.

In the group of emotional properties, the following factors are combined:

C - emotional stability
F - carelessness
H - courage in social contacts
I - emotional sensitivity
O - anxiety
Q4 - tension

The combination of factors C and I characterizes the sensitivity of the individual to emotional influences.

High values ​​of factors C (8-10 walls) and low values ​​of factor I (1-3 walls) are characteristic of a person who has a realistic perception of the environment, ongoing events. Feels protected, able to cope with various difficulties. The range of situations that evoke strong emotional reactions is limited. He tends to rationalize his own emotional experiences, impressions. In communication with other people, he focuses mainly on the reasonable. He rarely focuses on his own feelings.

The average values ​​of factors C (4-7 walls) and I (4-7 walls) are typical for a person who maintains emotional balance mainly in a familiar environment. With the unexpected appearance of additional difficulties, a short-term feeling of anxiety and helplessness arises. Strong emotional reactions are possible in those situations that deeply affect actual needs.

Low values ​​of factors C (1-3 walls) and high values ​​of factor I (8-10 walls) mean that a person perceives what is happening around him primarily emotionally. Emotional sensitivity is high. Emotions arise quickly, for any, even insignificant, reason. The range of emotional experiences is diverse: from enthusiasm, satisfaction to fear, anxiety and depression. Emotions become the main regulator of behavior and relationships with people.

The combination of factors H and F reflects the propensity for risky behavior.

High values ​​of factors H (8-10 walls) and F (8-10 walls) allow us to talk about optimism. Difficulties, failures of existing situations are not noticed or forced out. Belief in luck, in a favorable outcome of undertakings prevails. Life prospect is perceived positively. Attract risky situations. May risk both health and material well-being. Taking risks regardless of the consequences. Unjustified risk is possible, risk for the sake of risk.

The average values ​​of the factors H (4-7 walls) and F (4-7 walls) reflect a person's desire to find the positive in life. However, it is not possible to completely disconnect from troubles, from everyday problems. He believes in luck if the situations are familiar and you can use proven behavioral strategies and problem solving. Risks wisely. Risky situations attract when the risk is justified and success is realistically achievable.

Low values ​​of the factors H (1-3 wall) and F (1-3 wall) are found in those who tend to dramatize events, complicate what is happening. Mood is often depressed. Life perspective is perceived mostly negatively. Self-confidence is weak. The focus is on avoiding failure. The risk is scary. Risk situations are avoided.

The combination of factors O and Q4 characterizes different manifestations of anxiety as a personality trait.

High values ​​of factors O (8-10 walls) and Q4 (8-10 walls) describe a person who often worries about possible failures and unpleasant events, regrets his past actions. Dissatisfied with himself, feels guilty, which creates difficulties in relationships with others. Painfully endures criticism in his address. Praise, compliments are accepted with great distrust. He perceives obstacles on the way to achieving the goal as insurmountable, he tends to fixate on the unpleasant sides of events, which hinders the search for a way out of problem situations.

The average values ​​of factors O (4-7 walls) and Q4 (4-7 walls) refer to a person who experiences anxiety, anxiety in situations that are unusual for him. When the environment is familiar and predictable, the feeling of anxiety weakens or does not arise at all. He tries to objectively perceive what is happening and the people around him. Obstacles on the way to achieving the goal seem insurmountable, but for quite a long time he is looking for optimal ways out of the current problem situation. At first he perceives critical remarks addressed to him with irritation, then he finds a rational grain in them, and the irritation is removed. In conflict situations, he tends to blame not only others, but also himself.

Low values ​​of factors O (1-3 wall) and Q4 (1-3 wall) are typical for a person who critically perceives the surrounding reality. He rarely worries about the future, and does not care about past actions either. High self-esteem, self-confidence, satisfaction with one's achievements help to overcome real obstacles. Tolerant of critical remarks addressed to him. In conflict situations, he tends to blame others.

The group of regulatory personality traits includes the following factors:

Q3 - self-discipline
G - moral normativity

The combination of factors Q3 and G characterizes self-regulatory abilities.

High values ​​of factors Q3 (8-10 walls) and G (8-10 walls) are found in those who are able to mobilize themselves to achieve the goal in spite of internal resistance and external obstacles. Acts thoughtfully and persistently. Organized: finishes the work started, clearly represents the order of the work performed, plans the time. Maintains self-control in critical situations, is able to regulate external manifestations of emotions. Critical of himself. Behavior is often governed by the demands of the group, the demands of the people around them. Responsible, with a strong sense of duty.

The average values ​​of factors Q3 (4-7 walls) and G (4-7 walls) indicate a person's ability to be organized and persistent, especially in situations in which he has adapted. In the event of an unexpected appearance of an additional load, it can act chaotically, disorganized. Selectively applies to general group norms and requirements. Conscientiousness, responsibility in personally significant situations can be combined with the formal performance of duties when the situation does not affect personal interests.

Low values ​​of factors Q3 (1-3 wall) and G (1-3 wall) are typical for those who retreat from the desired goal as soon as internal or external obstacles appear. Often acts disorganized. He does not know how to plan and rationally allocate his time. Behavior is regulated mainly by personal, momentary desires and needs, so it does not always fit into the traditional framework. Their capabilities are not always evaluated critically. Fairly free of moral norms.

CONCLUSION ON PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH OF PERSONALITY
Ivanov Andrey Andreevich

HIGHER TECHNICAL EDUCATION
born in 1972

supply manager

The study was conducted using the following methods:

Dembo-Rubinstein self-esteem scale; The study of the level of claims according to F. Hoppe; Multivariate study of personality according to Cattell; Picture frustration test by S. Rosenzweig. The study of the characterological features of personality according to Leonhard. clinical conversation

The attitude to the survey is adequate, the nature of the contact is smooth, free.
With regard to the correct interpretation of the results of the study (conclusions and appendices), you should seek the advice of the author of the study.

The results of the study allow us to assume with a high degree of probability that the subject's self-assessment is extremely uneven and unstable. There is an inadequate and unrealistic underestimation of self-esteem in such personal parameters as "mind", "character". The subjects were introduced scales that indicate the importance of the social environment - such as "material wealth", "having friends", "work", but the current self-esteem for the first two is also underestimated. The level of ideal self-esteem, that is, the distant goals that a person tends to set for himself, is much lower than the norm. Perhaps this explains the somewhat overestimated scores on the happiness and self-satisfaction scales. It should also be noted that Andrei has an extremely low opinion of his own abilities.

The level of expectations placed on oneself is extremely low, which corresponds to the current self-esteem. The height of the level of claims is at the lower limit of the norm. The claims level profile is quite stable, adequate and realistic. Goal-setting tactics are distinguished by a fairly high level of maturity and flexibility, which indicates a well-developed strategic thinking and the ability to correlate the complexity of the chosen goals with real opportunities. Although the influence of emotions on the process of goal setting is not very significant, it still takes place. At the same time, failures practically do not affect the process of setting and achieving goals, and successes have a rather strong influence. The dominant motive is the motive to achieve success.

In the study of Andrey's personality, accentuation was revealed (very strongly pronounced qualities inherent in the personality) according to cyclothymic and stuck types. For people with cyclothymic accentuation, a cyclic change in mood is characteristic. Periods of good, sunny, mood are replaced by subdepressive phases. In this state, what used to be easy, requires incredible effort, companies are avoided. In tune with the mood, everything acquires a pessimistic coloring. Minor troubles and failures that appear due to a drop in efficiency are experienced extremely hard. Cyclothymics often respond to remarks and reproaches irritably, sometimes rudely and angrily, but, deep down, they fall into even more despondency. The stuck type is characterized by fixation on states or objects, it is quite difficult for them to move from one topic to another or from one state to another.
The emotional background of Andrei is generally lowered, while he is prone to quite strong emotional experiences.

When considering the reaction to a situation of frustration (that is, an obstacle that cannot be overcome immediately), it should be noted that the subject very aggressively attributes frustration to himself, blaming himself as a source of stress. In general, Andrey is not inclined to fixate on an obstacle; rather, he seeks to soften the situation, deny its significance, smooth out sharp corners. Thus, an ego-defensive reaction is manifested. The prevailing type of reaction to a situation of frustration is "with a fixation on the satisfaction of needs." The reaction takes either the form of waiting, when the subject believes that time and the course of events will lead to a correction of the situation, or he himself undertakes to resolve the situation. At the same time, it often happens that Andrey is not able to refuse to meet the needs in time, shows inflexibility, which negatively affects the situation.

The ratio of aggressiveness and self-demanding is balanced, the external expression of aggression is normal. A very high degree of independence. At the same time, the ability to process aggression is very low, which, apparently, leads to an increased tendency to experience feelings of guilt. The rating of group conformity, that is, the ability to adapt in society, has been lowered, there are likely to be problems in this area.

A study of Andrei's personality according to the Cattell multifactorial questionnaire revealed the following constitutional factors, that is, characteristic, habitual forms of response formed during life:

Intelligent Features- mental abilities at a good average level, there is some tendency to conservatism, that is, there are established views, ideas. More inclined to accept the time-tested, with some doubt about new ideas.

Emotional-volitional features- rather weak "I" - emotionally unstable, under the influence of feelings, easily upset, changeable. With disorders, he loses his balance of spirit, evades responsibility. Tends not to get into arguments in problematic situations. Possible hypochondria, fatigue, neurotic symptoms. Quite a strong sense of guilt. There are self-doubt, anxiety, a lot of fears, anxiety, forebodings. Depressive, impressionable, dominated by moods, easily vulnerable. The man is quite lonely. High ego tension - irritable and active despite fatigue.

Communicative properties and features of interpersonal interaction- in communication - kind, open, natural, laid-back, attentive to people, ready for community, prefers to join. However, sometimes it can be stubborn to the point of aggressiveness, conflict and wayward. Quite straightforward, emotionally unrestrained. Perhaps inexperienced in the analysis of motivations. Tends to be satisfied with what is available. In many cases, the process of interaction is influenced by a "defensive reaction" and internal tension, and then he is suspicious, delays his attention on failures, requires others to bear responsibility for mistakes, is suspicious.

Secondary factors due to temperament and constitutional features of the psyche are as follows:

Anxiety- high, possibly poor adaptability, dissatisfaction with what has been achieved, perhaps it even disrupts activity.

extraversion- Good at establishing and maintaining social contacts.

Sensitivity- fragile emotionality, sensitivity to subtleties, calmness, politeness, difficulty in making decisions due to an excess of thought

In the context of personality development, it is especially important for Andrey to pay attention to his own characteristics in the emotional sphere. He needs to learn to recognize and overcome his periods of discouragement, which affect his performance and relationships with others. At such moments, you need to more rationally and impartially analyze events and your own actions, make strong-willed efforts for constructive interaction with others.

It could be useful and interesting to work on revising your value system. This would provide good opportunities for raising self-esteem to an adequate level - after all, Andrey has very high intellectual prerequisites for a calm, non-judgmental analysis of both his personality and his own strategy in relationships with colleagues and clients. Changes in communicative interaction could also lead to a change in the application of managerial skills - his ability in strategic thinking, tactical planning is very important for work.

A leader dealing with Andrey must take into account his low self-esteem - Andrey needs support and encouragement. A higher assessment of his qualities and potential by a significant person for him will enable Andrey to increase his self-confidence and will positively affect his work. Success and praise, recognition are Andrey's strongest motivators.

In the process of communicating with Andrei, it must be remembered that he is very sensitive and vulnerable, although he tries not to show it. His rudeness, aggressiveness or isolation are manifestations of a "defensive reaction" designed to ensure a fragile inner balance; after such manifestations of emotions, he worries and blames himself much more than those around him. Therefore, any comments should be made in a very correct form and preferably in the absence of strangers - colleagues and employees.

Perhaps it will be useful to take into account Andrey's good strategic and tactical thinking, the dominance of the motive for achieving success. Involving him in solving problems of a higher level can give positive results both to the enterprise and to Andrey himself.

In the article we will tell you how to use the Cattell questionnaire to identify personal and intellectual qualities in candidates for a vacant position.

From the article you will learn:

Related materials:

What is the Cattell 16 Factor Personality Inventory

Raymond Cattell's 16-factor personality questionnaire (or 16 PF) is the most famous psychological test in the world. HR often use it during interviews. The Cattell 16 PF questionnaire is traditionally used in law enforcement and government agencies when testing the personal, psychological and intellectual qualities of candidates.

Cattell's multifactorial personality questionnaire is also interesting for those who want to conduct a self-diagnosis. The test results allow you to look at yourself from the outside, learn something new about yourself and understand what qualities you have to work on in order to improve psychological, personal and intellectual performance.

Cattell's 16-factor personality questionnaire allows you to determine scores for various personality traits. The data of the scales are correlated, as a result, five indicators, or higher-order factors, are formed. When passing the full version of the Cattell questionnaire, it is possible to conduct a study not only of personal qualities, but also of the level of intelligence. The Cattell test questionnaire is most effective in determining the degree of nervousness. This indicator is an important factor in the selection of personnel for some professions.

Forms of the Cattell Questionnaire

Today there are several forms of R. Cattell's questionnaire. The diversity is due to the fact that the source material has been repeatedly modified and adapted for subjects of different ages and levels of education.

The very first forms of personality questionnaires were published in the 49-50s of the last century. Options A and B consisted of 187 questions. Much later, revised forms C and D were published, consisting of 105 questions. Both options are intended for adult respondents who have a secondary or higher education.

16 factor questionnaire R. Cattell: a variant of 105 questions

Download the questionnaire in full

The Cattell Personality Inventory Forms E and F were published in 1960. They contain 128 questions. A little later, tests for minors were developed. 12 PF and 14 PF are for minors. The short version of 13 PF, which contains 79 questions, is used for adults and is often used when it is necessary to quickly determine the personality factors of the subjects.

But the 16-factor Cattell Form A and C questionnaire for adults is considered the most common variation.

Questionnaire 16 R. Cattell: a variant of 187 questions

Rules for passing the test-questionnaire Cattell

When passing the R. Cattell questionnaire of the 16-factor form A, it is necessary to answer 187 questions. In answering these questions, it is worth adhere to the basic principles of psychological testing:

• answer quickly without thinking about the answers;
• give the most sincere answers, since there are no right or wrong answers in the proposed options;
• try to choose the middle options as rarely as possible, such as: “I don’t know”, “I’m not sure”, “Sometimes”. Even if the exact options seem not quite correct, in order to get a reliable result, you need to choose the answer that is closer and allows you to identify personal qualities better.

It should be borne in mind that when calculating points, you can only get raw points. And only with the use of special formulas, points are transferred to the walls. According to the latest results, they look at the full transcript of testing on the 16-factor Cattell personality questionnaire.

An example of interpreting the results of the questionnaire

If a professional psychologist is present during the selection of candidates for a vacant position, it is necessary to initially draw up a personality profile schedule. Only on its basis, the most informative interpretation of the results is obtained so that there are no distortions. In addition to the basic interpretation of the relevant results, which are presented directly in the test window, you should also pay attention to additional explanations.

Instructions for the Cattell Questionnaire

The subjects are asked to answer questions - 187 or 105, depending on the form of the questionnaire. The main goal is to identify the characteristics of the character, inclinations, interests of a person. A person must choose one option from the three offered.

Responses to the Cattell Questionnaire must be given at 6 questions per minute. That is, each question is given no more than 10 seconds. Completing the entire questionnaire takes no more than 50 minutes. If it seems to the subject that some questions are not clearly formulated or sound as detailed as one would like, it is worth considering an average typical situation that could occur. You must answer honestly and sincerely. The purpose of the questionnaire is to find out those qualities that may be required in the future when working in a certain team and performing the corresponding duties.

Additions to the decoding of the 16-factor Cattell questionnaire

Cattell's 16-factor personality questionnaire can tell you more than about the main 16 factors that are primary. According to the test, 4 secondary factors can be determined, in the questionnaire itself they are indicated by letters and numbers F1, F2, F3 and F4.

Deciphering the factors of the Cattell questionnaire

Download key

Low and peak results in personality profiling are of most interest. High scores start from 8, low scores from 0 to 3. With a high number of average scores, it can be said that an appropriate balance between opposing characteristics is shown.

Of interest in deciphering the 16 PF questionnaire is not only the descriptions themselves for the main 16 primary factors, but their combinations. All factors are divided into four main blocks:

• the block of communicative properties includes factors A, H, E, L, N, Q2;
• factors B, M, N, Q1 are included in the block of intellectual properties;
• factors C, F, H, I, O, Q4 are responsible for the block of emotional qualities and properties;
• block of regulatory properties is confirmed by factors G, Q3.

Under high scores, walls 8-10 are considered, and under low scores, respectively, from 1 to 3. The average results indicate a balance between two completely opposite characteristics and the accuracy of determining personal properties, the quality of the applicant is often difficult.

Block of communicative properties in the Cattell questionnaire:

• A and H are a style of communication in which there is a need and initiation;
• L and N characterizes the understanding of other people, which is important in different fields of activity;
• E and Q2 - leadership issues, personal characteristics are based on the need to implement these properties.

Block of intellectual properties:

• B and M - developed intellectual orientation, ability to find compromises;
• N and Q1 - a person has flexibility of thinking, speed in making decisions.

Block of emotional properties:

• C and I confirm sensitivity, response to emotional impact;
• H and F show an appropriate attitude towards failure or risk;
• and Q4 determines the level of anxiety.

Block of regulatory properties

• G and Q3 - this is a high ability for self-motivation and self-organization.

When viewing the results of answers to questions, a primary, so-called raw data table is compiled. Further, the raw values ​​​​are transferred to the walls for women and men. Technical names are interpreted with everyday meanings. It is necessary to take into account not only the corresponding degree of severity of individual factors, but also their combinations that form symptom complexes.

An example of the analysis of the results of the Cattell test.

In order to identify personal characteristics, that is, to assess the individual psychological characteristics of the respondent's personality, a 16-factor Cattell test was carried out. Respondent - Gordienko A.V., female, 32 years old.

As a result of testing, the following values ​​of factors were revealed :

1

B: "low intelligence - high intelligence"

C: "emotional instability - emotional stability"

E: "conformity - dominance"

F: "restraint - expressiveness"

G: "Low Normative Behavior - High Normative Behavior"

N: "timidity - courage"

I: "rigidity - sensitivity"

L: "gullibility - suspicion"

M: "practicality - dreaminess"

N: "straightforwardness - diplomacy"

A: "calmness - anxiety"

Q1: "conservatism - radicalism"

Q2: "conformism - non-conformism"

Q3: "low self-control - high self-control"

Q4: "relaxation - tension"

Based on the test results, a graph of the values ​​of the factors of personal individual psychological characteristics of the respondent was constructed:

Based on the test results, the following conclusions can be drawn:

The respondent has a sufficient degree of openness in interpersonal contacts, the ability to communicate directly, at the same time, restraint and prudence in establishing social contacts, caution and shyness,a tendency to good nature, ease of communication, emotional expression; willingness to cooperate, attentiveness to people, kindness, kindness, adaptability to the situation and environment. Prefers those activities where there are activities with people, situations with social significance. This person is easily included in active groups. He is generous in personal relationships, not afraid of criticism. Well remembers events, surnames, names and patronymics.

In relation to people, gentleness, openness, insight, diplomacy are visible. In social behavior there is also independence from the opinion of the group, freedom from the pressure of generally accepted moral rules and norms, a tendency to independence.

When analyzing the efficiency of thinking, the general level of verbal culture and erudition, it was revealed that there is concreteness, logicality, and directness in thinking.

The respondent is characterized by high sensibility. He often acts at the behest of his heart and feelings, but in problem situations he does not enter into disputes and bickering, he avoids conflicts, although he can easily get upset.

Able to take the blame, yield, act tactfully and diplomatically in disputable situations, has a sufficient degree of conformity.

The character is dominated by restraint, seriousness, sobriety of thought, taciturnity, caution, a tendency to pessimism.

A low super-ego indicates a high degree of independence of the respondent, who has his own opinion on everything, a non-standard perception of generally accepted moral standards, the ability to boldly go against the majority. Strong, independent, relies on himself and his own strength, realistic, does not tolerate meaninglessness.

The respondent is prone to freedom from the tendency of jealousy, adaptable, cheerful, does not strive for competition, cares about others. Works well in a group.

Picky in the choice of friends, prefers to be friends with a few, delicate and attentive to others, able to take responsibility, quickly responding to danger. Does not believe in illusions, is realistic in thoughts and judgments, acts logically and practically, is not inclined to illusions and fantasies. Patient, able to work without paying attention to physical ailment. He easily forgets difficulties, is accommodating and friendly, easily gets along with people, works well in a team, tends to forgive and agree with people.

In the character there is dreaminess, a rich imagination. A person has a high creative potential, easily gets excited, immersed in inner needs, takes care of practical issues. Bohemian.

Reasonable, diplomatic, emotionally restrained, perceptive in relation to others, cautious in assessing others, a little insecure, easily vulnerable, impressionable, somewhat anxious.

Radical and experimenter, free-thinking and tolerant of inconvenience, critical, characterized by the presence of intellectual interests. Independent, independent of the group, resourceful, able to make decisions independently, regardless of other people's opinions, does not need additional support from other people.

A person with a sufficiently high degree of self-control, can subdue people, has leadership qualities, and an effective leader. Unperturbed, controls his behavior and emotions, always brings the work he has begun to its logical end.

Analyzing the secondary factors, we can conclude that the self-esteem of the individual and its certain maturity has an average value. That is, the personality of the respondent is adequate, has reached maturity. Life in general satisfies him, a person is able to achieve what he wants, but difficulties may arise in achieving difficult goals. Adaptability is sufficient, there is no high anxiety. In general, social normality, emotionally significant responsibility of behavior, self-discipline, self-control of emotions and behavior, emotional stability are characteristic.

The respondent is characterized by a slight timidity, shyness, restraint, secrecy, which is closer to an introvert, at the same time he establishes and maintains social contacts well, which is inherent in an extrovert, so we can conclude that this person is ambivalent.

A tendency to experience difficulties in connection with the emotionality manifested in everything was revealed, that is, the respondent may be of the type of dissatisfied and frustrated. There is a sensitivity to the nuances of life. If a problem arises, then it will take a lot of thought to resolve it before taking action. Probably artistic inclinations.

Scales: isolation - sociability, concrete thinking - abstract thinking, emotional instability - emotional stability, subordination - dominance, restraint - expressiveness, low normative behavior - high normative behavior, timidity - courage, realism - sensitivity, suspicion - gullibility, practicality - daydreaming, directness - insight, calmness - anxiety, conservatism - radicalism, dependence on the group - independence, low self-control - high self-control, relaxation - emotional tension

Purpose of the Cattell Personality Theory Test

Assessment of individual psychological characteristics of a person.

Cattell's personality theory - 105 questions

Instructions for the test personality factor theory

You are invited to a series of questions that will help determine some of the properties of your personality. There can be no "right" or "wrong" answers here. People are different and everyone can express their opinion.

Answering each question, you must choose one of the three proposed answers - the one that best matches your views, your opinion about yourself.

If something is not clear to you, ask. When answering questions, always remember:

1. You don't have to spend a lot of time thinking about the answers. Give the answer that comes to your mind first. Of course, questions will often not be formulated in as much detail as you would like. In this case, try to imagine the “average”, most frequent situation that corresponds to the meaning of the question and, based on this, choose the answer. Answer as accurately as possible, but not too slowly.

2. Try not to resort to intermediate, vague answers (like "don't know", "something in between", etc.) too often.

3. Be sure to answer all the questions in a row without skipping anything. Perhaps some questions will seem to you not very precisely formulated, but even then try to find the most accurate answer.

Answers can only be decrypted using a special "key".

4. Do not try to make a good impression with your answers, they must be true.

Cattell's test task:

1. I understood the instructions for this questionnaire well:
a. Yes;
b. not sure;
c. no.
2. I am ready to answer the questions as sincerely as possible:
a. Yes;
b. not sure;
c. no.
3. I would rather have a dacha:
a. in a busy holiday village;
b. would prefer something in between;
c. secluded in the forest.
4. I can find enough strength in myself to cope with life's difficulties:
a. always;
b. usually;
c. rarely.
5. Seeing wild animals makes me feel uncomfortable, even if they are safely hidden in cages:
a. Yes, that's right;
b. not sure;
c. no, that's not true.
6. I refrain from criticizing people and their views:
a. Yes;
b. sometimes;
c. no.
7. I make sharp, critical remarks to people if it seems to me that they deserve it:
a. usually;
b. sometimes;
c. never do.
8. I prefer uncomplicated classical music to modern popular tunes:
a. Yes, that's right;
b. not sure;
c. no, that's not true.
9. If I saw two neighbor kids fighting, I would:
a. I would let them figure out their own relations;
b. I don't know what I would do;
c. would try to sort out their quarrel.
10. At meetings and in companies:
a. I easily come forward;
b. something in between is true;
c. I prefer to stay on the sidelines.
11. In my opinion, it is more interesting to be:
a. design engineer;
b. don't know what to prefer;
c. playwright.
12. On the street, I would rather stop to see how an artist works than watch a street quarrel:
a. Yes, that's right;
b. not sure;
c. no, that's not true.
13. I usually tolerate self-satisfied people, even when they show off or otherwise show that they have a high opinion of themselves:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
14. If a person is cheating, I can almost always notice it from his facial expression:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
15. I believe that the most boring daily work should always be completed, even if it seems that this is not necessary:
a. I agree;
b. not sure;
c. disagree.
16. I would rather get to work:
a. where you can earn a lot, even if earnings are inconsistent;
b. don't know what to choose;
c. with a constant but relatively low salary.
17. I talk about my feelings:
a. only when necessary;
b. something in between is true;
c. willingly when given the opportunity.
18. Occasionally I experience a feeling of sudden fear or vague anxiety, I don’t know why:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
19. When I am unfairly criticized for something I am not guilty of:
a. I don't feel any guilt;
b. something in between is true;
c. I still feel a little guilty.
20. At work, I have more trouble with people who:
a. refuse to use modern methods;
b. don't know what to choose;
c. constantly trying to change something in the work, which is already going well.
21. When making decisions, I am guided more by:
a. heart;
b. heart and mind alike;
c. reason.
22. People would be happier if they spent more time with their friends:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
23. When making plans for the future, I often rely on luck:
a. Yes;
b. find it difficult to answer;
c. no.
24. Speaking, I tend to:
a. express your thoughts as soon as they come to mind;
b. something in between is true;
c. before you get your thoughts together.
25. Even if I am very angry with something, I calm down pretty quickly:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
26. With equal working hours and the same salary, it would be more interesting for me to work:
a. carpenter or cook;
b. don't know what to choose;
c. waiter in a good restaurant.
27. I had:
a. very few elected offices;
b. some;
c. many elected positions.
28. "Shovel" is related to "digging" as "knife" is to:
a. spicy;
b. cut;
c. sharpen.
29. Sometimes some thought keeps me awake:
a. Yes, that's right;
b. not sure;
c. no, that's not true.
30. In my life, as a rule, I achieve the goals that I set for myself:
a. Yes, that's right;
b. not sure;
c. no, that's not true.
31. An obsolete law should be changed:
a. only after a thorough discussion;
b. something in between is true;
c. immediately.
32. I feel uncomfortable when things require me to take quick actions that somehow affect other people:
a. Yes, that's right;
b. not sure;
c. no, that's not true.
33. Most of my acquaintances consider me a cheerful conversationalist:
a. Yes;
b. not sure;
c. no.
34. When I see untidy, slovenly people:
a. I don't care;
b. something in between is true;
c. they make me hate and hate.
35. I get a little lost when I suddenly find myself in the spotlight:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
36. I am always happy to join a big company, for example, meet friends in the evening, go to a dance, take part in an interesting social event:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
37. At school I preferred:
a. music lessons (singing);
b. Hard to say;
c. workshops, manual labor.
38. If I am appointed responsible for something, I insist that my orders are strictly followed, otherwise I refuse the order:
a. Yes;
b. sometimes;
c. no.
39. It is more important that parents:
a. contributed to the subtle development of feelings in their children;
b. something in between is true;
c. teach children to manage their feelings.
40. Participating in collective work, I would prefer:
a. try to improve the organization of work;
b. something in between is true;
c. keep records and ensure that the rules are followed.
41. From time to time I feel the need to do something that requires significant physical effort:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
42. I would rather treat people who are polite and delicate than rude and straightforward:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
43. When I am criticized in public, it depresses me extremely:
a. Yes, that's right;
b. something in between is true;
c. this is not true.
44. If my boss calls me, I:
a. I use this occasion to ask for what I need;
b. something in between is true;
c. I'm worried that I did something wrong.
45. I believe that people should think very seriously before giving up the experience of previous years, past centuries:
a. Yes;
b. not sure;
c. no.
46. ​​When reading something, I am always well aware of the hidden intention of the author to convince me of something:
a. Yes;
b. not sure;
c. no.
47. When I was in grades 7-10, I participated in the sports life of the school:
a. often;
b. from time to time;
c. rarely.
48. I keep a good order at home and almost always know what is where:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
49. When I think about what happened during the day, I often feel anxious:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
50. Sometimes I doubt if the people I talk to are really interested in what I say:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
51. If I had to choose, I would rather be:
a. forester;
b. hard to choose;
c. high school teacher.
52. For birthday, for holidays:
a. I like to make gifts;
b. find it difficult to answer;
c. I think that buying gifts is a somewhat unpleasant duty.
53. "Tired" is related to "work" as "proud" is to:
a. smile;
b. success;
c. happy.
54. Which of the following words does not fit the other two:
a. candle;
b. moon;
c. lamp.
55. My friends:
a. I was not let down;
b. occasionally;
c. failed quite often.
56. I have such qualities in which I definitely surpass other people:
a. Yes;
b. not sure;
c. no.
57. When I am upset, I do my best to hide my feelings from others:
a. Yes, that's right;
b. rather something in between;
c. this is not true.
58. I would like to go to the cinema, to various performances and other places where you can have fun:
a. more than once a week (more often than most people);
b. about once a week (like most);
c. less than once a week (less than most).
59. I think that personal freedom in behavior is more important than good manners and respect for the rules of etiquette:
a. Yes;
b. not sure;
c. no.
60. In the presence of people more important than me (people older than me, or with more experience, or with a higher position), I tend to be modest:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
61. I find it difficult to tell something to a large group of people or to speak in front of a large audience:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
62. I am well oriented in an unfamiliar area, I can easily tell where is north, where is south, east or west:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
63. If someone got angry with me:
a. I would try to calm him down;
b. I don't know what I would do;
c. it would irritate me.
64. When I see an article that I consider unfair, I tend to forget about it rather than answer the author indignantly:
a. Yes, that's right;
b. not sure;
c. no, that's not true.
65. Non-essential trifles do not stay in my memory for a long time, for example, the names of streets, shops:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
66. I would like the profession of a veterinarian who treats and operates on animals:
a. Yes;
b. Hard to say;
c. no.
67. I eat with pleasure and do not always take care of my manners as carefully as other people do:
a. Yes, that's right;
b. not sure;
c. no, that's not true.
68. There are periods when I don’t want to meet anyone:
a. rarely;
b. something in between is true;
c. often.
69. Sometimes they tell me that my voice and appearance too clearly betray my excitement:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
70. When I was a teenager and my opinion was at odds with my parents, I usually:
a. remained in his opinion;
b. average between a and b;
c. yielded, recognizing their authority.
71. I would like to work in a separate room, and not with colleagues:
a. Yes;
b. not sure;
c. no.
72. I would rather live quietly as I please than be admired for my success:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
73. In many ways, I consider myself quite a mature person:
a. Yes, that's right;
b. not sure;
c. no, that's not true.
74. Criticism in the form in which it is carried out by many people unsettles me rather than helps:
a. often;
b. occasionally;
c. never.
75. I am always able to strictly control the manifestation of my feelings:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
76. If I made a useful invention, I would prefer:
a. work on it in the laboratory further;
b. hard to choose;
c. take care of its practical use.
77. "Surprise" is related to "unusual" as "fear" is to:
a. brave;
b. restless;
c. horrible.
78. Which of the following fractions does not fit the other two:
a. 3/7;
b. 3/9;
c. 3/11.
79. It seems to me that some people do not notice or avoid me, although I do not know why:
a. yes, that's right;
b. not sure;
c. no, that's not true.
80. People treat me less kindly than I deserve with my kind attitude towards them:
a. Often;
b. sometimes;
c. never.
81. The use of obscene expressions is always disgusting to me (even if there are no persons of the opposite sex):
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
82. I definitely have fewer friends than most people:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
83. I really don’t like to be where there is no one to talk to:
a. right;
b. not sure;
c. wrong.
84. People sometimes call me frivolous, although they consider me a pleasant person:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
85. In various situations in society, I experienced excitement similar to that experienced by a person before going on stage:
a. often;
b. occasionally;
c. hardly ever.
86. Being in a small group of people, I am content to keep aloof and for the most part let others speak:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
87. I like to read more:
a. realistic descriptions of acute military or political conflicts;
b. don't know what to choose;
c. a novel that excites the imagination and the senses.
88. When they try to command me, I purposely do the opposite:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
89. If the authorities or family members reproach me for something, then, as a rule, only for the cause:
a. right;
c. wrong.
90. I don’t like the way some people “stare” and unceremoniously look at a person in a store or on the street:
a. right;
b. something in between is true;
c. wrong.
91. During a long journey, I would prefer:
a. read something difficult, but interesting;
b. I don't know what I would choose;
c. spend time chatting with a fellow traveler.
92. There is nothing bad or contrary to good taste in jokes about death:
a. yes, I agree;
b. something in between is true;
c. no, I don't agree.
93. If my acquaintances mistreat me and do not hide their hostility:
a. this does not depress me at all;
b. something in between is true;
c. I lose heart.
94. I feel uneasy when they compliment me and praise me in the face:
a. Yes, that's right;
b. something in between is true;
c. no, that's not true.
95. I would rather have a job:
a. with a well-defined and constant income;
b. something in between is true;
c. with a higher salary, which would depend on my efforts and productivity.
96. It is easier for me to solve a difficult question or problem:
a. if I discuss them with others;
b. something in between is true;
c. if I think about them alone.
97. I willingly participate in public life, in the work of various commissions:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
98. When doing any work, I do not calm down until even the smallest details are taken into account:
a. right;
b. average between a and b;
c. wrong.
99. Sometimes very minor obstacles annoy me very much:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
100. I sleep soundly, never talk in my sleep:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
101. If I worked in the economic sphere, it would be more interesting for me:
a. to talk with customers, clients;
b. I choose something in between;
c. keep accounts and other documents.
102. "Size" is to "length" as "dishonest" is to:
a. prison;
b. sinful;
c. stole.
103. AB treats GV in the same way as SR treats:
a. ON;
b. OP;
c. THAT.
104. When people behave imprudently and recklessly:
a. I take it easy;
b. something in between is true;
c. I feel contempt for them.
105. When I listen to music, and they are talking loudly nearby:
a. it doesn't bother me, I can concentrate;
b. something in between is true;
c. it spoils my pleasure and angers me.
106. I think that it is more correct to say about me that I:
a. polite and calm;
b. something in between is true;
c. energetic and assertive.
107. I believe that:
a. you need to live according to the principle “time is business - hour is fun”;
b. something between a and b;
c. you need to live cheerfully, not particularly caring about tomorrow.
108. It is better to be careful and expect little than to rejoice in advance, anticipating success in the depths of your soul:
a. I agree;
b. not sure;
c. disagree.
109. If I think about possible difficulties in my work:
a. I try to plan in advance how to deal with them;
b. something in between is true;
c. I think I can deal with them when they appear.
110. I easily get used to any society:
a. Yes;
b. not sure;
c. no.
111. When you need a little diplomacy and the ability to convince people of something, they usually turn to me:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
112. I would be more interested:
a. advise young people, help them in choosing a job;
b. find it difficult to answer;
c. work as an economic engineer.
113. If I am absolutely sure that a person is acting unfairly or selfishly, I declare this to him, even if this threatens me with some troubles:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
114. Sometimes I jokingly make some kind of silly remark just to surprise people and see what they say about it:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
115. I would love to work in a newspaper as a reviewer of theatrical performances, concerts, etc.:
a. Yes;
b. not sure;
c. no.
116. If I have to sit in a meeting for a long time without talking or moving, I never feel the need to draw anything and fidget in my chair:
a. I agree;
b. not sure;
c. disagree.
117. If someone tells me something that, as I know, is not true, I would rather think:
a. "he is a liar";
b. something in between is true;
c. "Apparently he was misinformed."
118. A presentiment that some kind of punishment awaits me, even if I have not done anything wrong, arises in me:
a. often;
b. sometimes;
c. never.
119. The opinion that illnesses are caused by mental causes to the same extent as by physical (bodily) ones is greatly exaggerated:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
120. Solemnity, colorfulness must be preserved in any important state ceremony:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
121. It is unpleasant for me if people think that I am too unrestrained and neglect the rules of decency:
a. very;
b. Little;
c. not worried at all.
122. When working on something, I would rather do this:
a. in a collective;
b. I don't know what I would choose;
c. on one's own.
123. There are periods when it is difficult to resist feeling sorry for oneself:
a. often;
b. sometimes;
c. never.
124. People often piss me off too quickly:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
125. I can always get rid of old habits without much difficulty and not return to them anymore:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
126. With the same salary, I would prefer to be:
a. a lawyer;
b. find it difficult to choose;
c. navigator or pilot.
127. "Better" is to "worst" as "slower" is to:
a. ambulance;
b. the best;
c. fastest.
128. Which of the following combinations of signs should continue XOOOHHOOOXXX:
a. OHHH;
b. OOHH;
c. HOOO.
129. When the time comes for the implementation of what I planned and expected in advance, I sometimes feel unable to do it:
a. I agree;
b. something in between is true;
c. disagree.
130. Usually I can concentrate and work without paying attention to the fact that people around are very noisy:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
131. It happens that I tell strangers about things that seem important to me, regardless of whether they ask me about it or not:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
132. I spend a lot of free time talking with friends about those pleasant events that we once experienced together:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
133. It gives me pleasure to do risky things just for fun:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
134. I am very annoyed by the sight of an untidy room:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
135. I consider myself a very sociable (open) person:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
136. In dealing with people:
a. I don't try to contain my feelings;
b. something in between is true;
c. I hide my feelings.
137. I love music:
a. light, lively, chilly;
b. something in between is true;
c. emotional and sentimental.
138. I admire the beauty of the verse more than the beauty and perfection of weapons:
a. Yes;
b. not sure;
c. no.
139. If my lucky remark went unnoticed:
a. I don't repeat it;
b. find it difficult to answer;
c. I repeat my remark again.
140. I would like to work among juvenile delinquents released on bail:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
141. More important for me:
a. maintain good relationships with people;
b. something in between is true;
c. express your feelings freely.
142. On a tourist trip, I would rather stick to a program drawn up by experts than plan my own itinerary:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
143. They rightly think of me that I am a stubborn and hardworking person, but I rarely achieve success:
a. Yes;
b. not sure;
c. no.
144. If people abuse my disposition towards them, I am not offended and quickly forget about it:
a. I agree;
b. not sure;
c. disagree.
145. If a heated argument broke out in a group:
a. I would be curious to see who would emerge victorious;
b. something in between is true;
c. I would really like everything to end peacefully.
146. I prefer to plan my affairs myself, without outside interference and other people's advice:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
147. Sometimes a feeling of envy affects my actions.
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
148. I am firmly convinced that the boss may not always be right, but he always has the right to insist on his own:
a. Yes;
b. not sure;
c. no.
149. I get nervous when I think about everything that awaits me:
a. Yes;
b. sometimes;
c. no.
150. If I participate in some game, and others loudly express their opinions, this does not unbalance me:
a. I agree;
b. not sure;
c. disagree.
151. It seems to me interesting to be:
a. artist;
b. don't know what to choose;
c. director of a theater or film studio.
152. Which of the following words does not fit the other two:
a. any;
b. some;
c. most of.
153. "Flame" is related to "heat" as "rose" is to:
a. spikes;
b. red petals;
c. smell.
154. I have such disturbing dreams that I wake up:
a. often;
b. occasionally;
c. almost never.
155. Even if there are many things against the success of any undertaking, I still believe that it is worth the risk:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
156. I like situations in which I unwittingly find myself in the role of a leader, because I know better than anyone what the team should do:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
157. I would rather dress modestly, like everyone else, than catchy and original:
a. I agree;
b. not sure;
c. disagree.
158. An evening spent doing what I love attracts me more than a lively party:
a. I agree;
b. not sure;
c. disagree.
159. Sometimes I neglect the good advice of people, although I know that I should not do this:
a. occasionally;
b. hardly ever;
c. never.
160. When making decisions, I consider it obligatory for myself to take into account the main forms of behavior - “what is good and what is bad”:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
161. I don't like it when people watch me work:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
162. It is not always possible to achieve something by gradual, moderate methods, sometimes it is necessary to use force:
a. I agree;
b. something in between is true;
c. disagree.
163. At school I preferred (prefer):
a. Russian language;
b. Hard to say;
c. mathematics.
164. Sometimes I had grief because people spoke badly about me behind my back without any reason:
a. Yes;
b. find it difficult to answer;
c. no.
165. Conversations with ordinary people bound by conventions and habits:
a. are often very interesting and informative;
b. something in between is true;
c. annoy me because the conversation revolves around trifles and lacks depth.
166. Some things cause such anger in me that I prefer not to talk about them at all:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
167. In education it is more important:
a. surround the child with love and care;
b. something in between is true;
c. develop desirable skills and attitudes in the child.
168. People consider me a calm, balanced person who remains unperturbed under any circumstances:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
169. I think that our society, guided by expediency, should create new customs and cast aside old habits and traditions:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
170. I had unpleasant cases due to the fact that, thinking, I became inattentive:
a. hardly ever;
b. something in between is true;
c. repeatedly.
171. I learn the material better:
a. reading a well-written book;
b. something in between is true;
c. participating in a group discussion.
172. I prefer to go my own way instead of sticking to generally accepted rules:
a. I agree;
b. not sure;
c. disagree.
173. Before expressing my opinion, I prefer to wait until I am completely sure that I am right:
a. always;
b. usually;
c. only if it is practically possible.
174. Sometimes little things unbearably get on my nerves, although I understand that these are nothing:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
175. I don't often say things on the spur of the moment that I later regret:
a. I agree;
b. something in between is true;
c. disagree.
176. If I were asked to organize a collection of money for a gift to someone or to participate in the organization of an anniversary celebration:
a. I would agree;
b. I don't know what I would do;
c. I would say that, unfortunately, I am very busy.
177. Which of the following words does not fit the other two:
a. wide;
b. zigzag;
c. straight.
178. "Soon" refers to "never" as "close" to:
a. nowhere;
b. far;
c. away.
179. If I made some mistake in society, I quickly forget about it:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
180. People around me know that I have many different ideas and I can almost always offer some kind of solution to a problem:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
181. Perhaps more typical for me:
a. nervousness when faced with unexpected difficulties;
b. don't know what to choose;
c. tolerance for the desires (requirements) of other people.
182. I am considered a very enthusiastic person:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
183. I like work that is varied, often changes and travels, even if it is a little dangerous:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
184. I am a very punctual person and I always insist that everything be done as accurately as possible:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
185. I enjoy work that requires special conscientiousness and precise skill:
a. Yes;
b. something in between is true;
c. no.
186. I belong to the number of energetic people who are always busy with something:
a. Yes;
b. not sure;
c. no.
187. I conscientiously answered all the questions and did not miss a single one:
a. Yes;
b. not sure;
c. no.

Processing and interpretation of test results
Key to Cattell's Factor Theory of Personality

Factor, Question numbers, answer types
BUT- (3 - a,b), (26-b,c), (27-b,c), (51-b,c), (52-a,b), (76-c,b), ( 101-a,b), (126-a,b), (151-c,b), (176-a,b);

B- (28-b), (53-b), (54-b), (77-c), (78-b), (102-c), (103-b), (127-c), ( 128-b), (152-a), (153-c), (177-a), (178-a);

C— (4-a,b), (5-c,b), (29-c,b), (30-a,b), (55-a,b), (79-c,b), ( 80-c,b), (104-a,b), (105-a,b), (129-c,b), (130-a,b), (154-c,b), (179- a,b);

E— (6-c,b), (7-a,b), (31-c,b), (32-c,b), (56-a,b), (57-c,b), ( 81-c,b), (106-c,b), (131-a,b), (155-a,b), (156-a,b), (180-a,b), (181- a,b);

F— (8-b,c), (33-a,b), (58-a,b), (82-b,c), (83-a,b), (107-b,c), ( 108-b,c), (132-a,b), (133-a,b), (157-b,c), (158-b,c), (182-a,b), (183- a,b);

G— (9-b,c), (34-b,c), (59-b,c), (84-b,c), (109-a,b), (134-a,b), ( 159-b,c), (160-a,b), (184-a,b), (185-a,b);

H— (10-a,b), (35-b,c), (36-a,b), (60-b,c), (61-b,c), (85-b,c), ( 86-b,c), (110-a,b), (111-a,b), (135-a,b), (136-a,b), (161-b,c), (186- a,b);

I— (11-b,c), (12-a,b), (37-a,b), (62-b,c), (87-b,c), (112-a,b), ( 137-b,c), (138-a,b), (162-b,c), (163-a,b);

L— (13-b,c), (38-a,b), (63-b,c), (64-b,c), (88-a,b), (89-b,c), ( 113-a,b), (114-a,b), (139-b,c), (164-a,b);

M— (14-b,c), (15-b,c), (39-a,b), (40-a,b), (65-a,b), (90-b,c), ( 91-a,b), (115-a,b), (116-a,b), (140-a,b), (141-b,c), (165-b,c), (166- b,c);

N— (16-b,c), (17-a,b), (41-b,c), (42-a,b), (66-b,c), (67-b,c), ( 92-b,c), (117-a,b), (142-b,c), (167-a,b);

O— (18-a,b), (19-b,c), (43-a,b), (44-b,c), (68-b,c), (69-a,b), ( 93-b,c), (94-a,b), (118-a,b), (119-a,b), (143-a,b), (144-b,c), (168- b,c);

Q1— (20-a,b), (21-a,b), (45-b,c), (46-a,b), (70-a,b), (95-b,c), ( 120-b,c), (145-a,b), (169-a,b), (170-b,c);

Q2— (22-b,c), (47-a,b), (71-a,b), (72-a,b), (96-b,c), (97-b,c), ( 121-b,c), (122-b,c), (146-a,b), (171-a,b);

Q3— (23-b,c), (24-b,c), (48-a,b), (73-a,b), (98-a,b), (123-b,c), ( 147-b,c), (148-a,b), (172-b,c), (173-a,b);

Q4— (25-b,c), (49-a,b), (50-a,b), (74-a,b), (75-b,c), (99-a,b), ( 100-b,c), (124-a,b), (125-b,c), (149-a,b), (150-b,c), (174-a,b), (175- b,c).

In the factor B a key match equals 1 point. In the remaining factors, matching with "b" is equal to 1 point, and matching with the letters "a" and "c" by key is equal to 2 points.

Formulas for calculating the secondary factors of the Cattell test

F1 = [(38 + 2L + 3O + 4Q4) - (2C +2 H + 2Q3)] / 10;
F2 = [(2A + 3E + 4F + 5H) - (2Q2 +11)] / 10;
F3 = [(77 + 2C + 2E + 2F + 2N) - (4A + 6I + 2M)] / 10;
F4 = [(4E + 3M + 4Q1 + 4Q2) - (3A + 2C)] / 10;

Description of the primary factors of the Cattell test

1. Factor A: "isolation - sociability"
A- / 0-6 points A+ / 7-12 points
Secretiveness, isolation, alienation, distrust, lack of sociability, isolation, criticality, a tendency to objectivity, rigidity, to excessive severity in assessing people. Difficulties in establishing interpersonal, direct contacts Sociability, openness, naturalness, ease, willingness to cooperate, adaptability, attention to people, willingness to work together, activity in eliminating conflicts in a group, willingness to go on about. Ease in establishing direct, interpersonal contacts
Pole A- in the technical name is called sizothymia (from the Latin word sizo, which means boring, dull). Pole A + is called affectothymia, and it characterizes the intense expression of affects (feelings). Emotionally "sluggish", "dry" personality tends to be careful when expressing feelings, it is not very expressive. The most striking feature of affectothymia is good nature, cheerfulness, interest in people, emotional susceptibility.

In general, factor A is focused on measuring a person's sociability in small groups and the ability to establish direct, interpersonal contacts.

In the answers to the questionnaire, a person with A+ prefers working with people, social approval, likes to keep up with the times. A person with the A- pole loves ideas, prefers to work alone. There is evidence that individuals with A+ are sociable, can be leaders in small groups, and often choose to work with people; individuals with the A- pole can be artists, research scientists and prefer to work independently, in isolation from the group.

1-3 wall - prone to rigidity, coldness, skepticism and aloofness. Things attract him more than people. Prefers to work on his own, avoiding compromise. Prone to accuracy, rigidity in activities, personal attitudes. This is desirable in many professions. Sometimes he tends to be critical, inflexible, hard, tough.
4 wall - restrained, isolated, critical, cold (schizothymia).
7 walls - outward-facing, easy to communicate, affective participation (cyclothymia).
8-10 walls - a tendency to good nature, ease of communication, emotional expression; ready for cooperation, attentive to people, soft-hearted, kind, adaptable. Prefers those activities where there are activities with people, situations with social significance. This person is easily included in active groups. He is generous in personal relationships, not afraid of criticism. Well remembers events, surnames, names and patronymics.

2. Factor B: intelligence
B- / 0-3 points B+ / 4-8 points
Concreteness and some rigidity of thinking, difficulties in solving abstract problems, reduced efficiency of thinking, insufficient level of general verbal culture. Developed abstract thinking, efficiency, ingenuity, quick learner. A fairly high level of general culture, especially verbal.
Factor B does not determine the level of intelligence, it is focused on measuring the efficiency of thinking and the general level of verbal culture and erudition. It should be noted that low scores for this factor may depend on other personality characteristics: anxiety, frustration, low educational qualifications. And most importantly, factor B is perhaps the only factor of the methodology that is not strictly validated. Therefore, the results for this factor are indicative.

1-3 wall - tends to understand the material more slowly when learning. "Dumb", prefers a specific, literal interpretation. His "dumbness" either reflects low intelligence, or is a consequence of a decrease in functions as a result of psychopathology.
4th wall - less intellectually developed, thinks concretely (less ability to learn).
7 walls - more intellectually developed, abstract thinking, reasonable (high learning ability).
8-10 walls - quickly perceives and assimilates new educational material. There is some correlation with the cultural level, as well as with reactivity. High scores indicate the absence of a decrease in the functions of the intellect in pathological conditions.

3. Factor C: "emotional instability - emotional stability"
C- / 0-6 points C+ / 7-12 points
Emotional instability, impulsiveness; a person is under the influence of feelings, changeable in moods, easily upset, unstable in interests. Low tolerance for frustration, irritability, fatigue. Emotional stability, endurance; a person is emotionally mature, calm, stable in interests, efficient, can be rigid, oriented to reality.
This factor characterizes the dynamic generalization and maturity of emotions as opposed to unregulated emotionality. Psychoanalysts have tried to describe this factor as ego-strength and ego-weakness. According to the Cattell method, a person with the C- pole is easily irritated by certain events or people, is not satisfied with life situations, his own health, and besides, this person is weak-willed. However, this interpretation is quite orthodox, since it does not take into account the plasticity of the emotional sphere. People with a high score on the C+ factor are more likely to be leaders than those whose scores on this factor are closer to the C- pole. On the other hand, for the management team, the range of indicators for factor C is wide; some of them have low values ​​for this factor (perhaps, the reaction of fatigue and anxiety under stress have an effect here).

It has been established that people with high and medium scores on factor C are also characterized by higher moral qualities.

In general, the factor has a genetic origin and aims to measure emotional stability; it correlates to a large extent with the concepts of a weak and strong nervous system (according to I.P. Pavlov).

Professions that require overcoming stressful situations (managers, pilots, rescuers, etc.) should be owned by individuals with high scores on factor C. At the same time, in professions where quick decision-making is not required, emotional stability and where it is possible to resolve the issue yourself (artists, postmen, etc.), you can have low marks for this factor.

1-3 wall - there is a low threshold in relation to frustration, changeable and plastic, avoiding the requirements of reality, neurotic fatigue, irritable, emotionally excitable, having neurotic symptoms (phobias, sleep disturbances, psychosomatic disorders). A low threshold is characteristic of all forms of neurotic and some mental disorders.
4th wall - sensitive, emotionally less stable, easily upset.
7 walls - emotionally stable, soberly assessing reality, active, mature.
8-10 walls - emotionally mature, stable, unflappable. High ability to comply with social moral norms. Sometimes humble resignation to unresolved emotional issues. A good level of "C" allows you to adapt even with mental disorders.

4. Factor E: "subordination-dominance"
E- / 0-5 points E+ / 6-12 points
Gentleness, compliance, tact, meekness, courtesy, dependence, resignation, helpfulness, respectfulness, shyness, willingness to take the blame, modesty, expressiveness, a tendency to easily get out of balance. Independence, independence, perseverance, stubbornness, assertiveness, willfulness, sometimes conflict, aggressiveness, refusal to recognize external power, a tendency to authoritarian behavior, a thirst for admiration, a rebel.
Factor E does not significantly correlate with leadership achievement, but is associated with social status and is higher for leaders than for followers. There is an assumption that the estimates for this factor change with age and depend on the gender of the subject. In their behavior, people with high scores (on this factor) experience a need for autonomy.

1-3 wall - yielding to others, submissive. Often dependent, admits his guilt. Strives for obsessive observance of correctness, rules. This passivity is part of many neurotic syndromes.
4 wall - modest, submissive, soft, compliant, supple, conformal, adaptable.
7 walls - self-affirming, independent, aggressive, stubborn (dominant).
8-10 walls - asserting himself, his "I", self-confident, independently thinking. Inclined to asceticism, guided by his own rules of conduct, hostile and extrapunitive (authoritarian), commands others, does not recognize authorities.

5. Factor F: "restraint - expressiveness"
F- / 0-5 points F+ / 6-12 points
Prudence, caution, prudence in choosing a communication partner. A tendency to concern, worry about the future, pessimism in the perception of reality, restraint in the manifestation of emotions. Cheerfulness, impulsiveness, enthusiasm, carelessness, recklessness in choosing communication partners, emotional significance of social contacts, expressiveness, expansiveness, emotional brightness in relationships between people, communication dynamism, which involves emotional leadership in groups
This factor is a component of the second-order factors of various personality traits. An interesting fact is that over the years, the manifestation of impulsivity and carelessness gradually decreases, which can be considered as evidence of a certain emotional maturity.

In general, factor F is focused on measuring emotional coloring and dynamism in communication processes. Example: actors, effective leaders have higher ratings, artists, followers have lower ones.

1-3 wall - unhurried, restrained. Sometimes gloomy, pessimistic, prudent. It is considered a very accurate, sober, reliable person.
4 wall - sober, cautious, serious, silent;
7 walls - careless, impulsively lively, cheerful, full of enthusiasm.
8-10 walls - cheerful, active, talkative, carefree, can be impulsive.

6. Factor G: "low normative behavior - high normative behavior"
G- / 0-6 points G+ / 7-12 points
Tendency to inconstancy, susceptibility to the influence of feelings, chance and circumstances. Indulges his desires, does not make efforts to fulfill group requirements and norms. Disorganization, irresponsibility, impulsiveness, lack of agreement with generally accepted moral rules and standards, flexibility in relation to social norms, freedom from their influence, sometimes unscrupulousness and a tendency to antisocial behavior. Conscientiousness, responsibility, stability, balance, perseverance, a tendency to moralize, reasonableness, conscientiousness. Developed sense of duty and responsibility, conscious observance of generally accepted moral rules and norms, perseverance in achieving goals, business orientation.
This factor resembles factor C, especially in regard to the role of self-regulation of behavior and attitudes towards other people. This factor characterizes the features of the emotional-volitional sphere (persistence, organization - irresponsibility, disorganization) and the features of the regulation of social behavior (acceptance or ignorance of generally accepted moral rules and norms). Psychoanalysts interpret this factor as a high superego and a low superego. The researcher should be especially careful when analyzing low scores for this factor (G-), since there is no direct correlation between low scores and pronounced antisocial behavior (for example, with criminals). On the contrary, it is known that many people who do not perceive "morality of the middle class", "intellectuals", "emancipated individuals", persons expressing humanistic ideals and flexible attitude to social and cultural traditions, may have low scores on this factor.

High scores can often characterize not only strong-willed personality traits, but also a tendency to cooperate and conformism.

1-3 wall - a tendency to inconstancy of purpose, laid-back in behavior, does not make efforts to fulfill group tasks, fulfill social and cultural requirements. His freedom from the influence of the group may lead to antisocial acts, but at times makes his activity more effective. Refusal to obey the rules reduces somatic disorders under stress.
4 wall - taking advantage of the moment, looking for benefits in a situation. Avoids rules, feels unobligatory.
7 walls - conscious, persistent, you can rely on him, sedate, obligatory.
8-10 walls - demanding of himself, guided by a sense of duty, persistent, takes responsibility, conscientious, prone to moralizing, prefers hard-working people, witty.

7. Factor H: "timidity - courage"
H- / 0-5 points H+ / 6-12 points
Shyness, shyness, emotional restraint, caution, social passivity, delicacy, attentiveness to others, increased sensitivity to threat, preference for an individual style of activity and communication in a small group (2-3 people). Courage, enterprise, activity; a person has emotional interests, a willingness to take risks and cooperate with strangers in unfamiliar circumstances, the ability to make independent, extraordinary decisions, a propensity for adventurism and the manifestation of leadership qualities.
Factor H is a well-defined factor that characterizes the degree of activity in social contacts. It should be taken into account that this factor has a genetic origin and reflects the activity of the organism and the characteristics of temperament. People with high ratings of this factor have a penchant for risky professions (test pilots), are stubborn, sociable, able to withstand emotional stress, which often makes them leaders.

Low estimates of this factor characterize people who are shy, timid, not social, and difficult to make independent decisions.

1-3 wall - shy, evasive, kept aloof, "stewed". Usually feels a sense of insufficiency. Speech is slow, difficult, difficult to express. Avoids professions associated with personal contacts. Prefers to have 1-2 close friends, not inclined to delve into everything that happens around him.
4 wall - shy, reserved, insecure, fearful, timid.
7 walls - adventurous, socially bold, uninhibited, spontaneous.
8-10 walls - sociable, courageous, trying new things; spontaneous and lively in the emotional sphere. His "thick skin" allows him to endure complaints and tears, difficulties in communicating with people in emotionally intense situations. May be careless about details, not responding to danger signals.

8. Factor I: "rigidity - sensitivity"
I- / 0-5 points for men, 0-6 points for women I+ / 6-12 points for men, 7-12 points for women
Unsentimentality, self-confidence, severity, rationality, flexibility in judgment, practicality, sometimes some rigidity and callousness in relation to others, rationality, logic. Sensitivity, impressionability, richness of emotional experiences, a penchant for romanticism, artistic perception of the world, developed aesthetic interests, artistry, femininity, a tendency to empathy, sympathy, empathy and understanding of other people, refined emotionality.
According to a number of studies, people with high scores on this factor tend to be romantically inclined, love travel and new experiences. They have a developed imagination, aesthetics are important to them.

This factor reflects differences in the cultural level and aesthetic susceptibility of the individual. An interesting fact is that people with low scores on this factor get sick less, are more aggressive, play sports more often, and are athletic.

The characteristics of this factor are closer to the second-order factor "low emotionality - high emotionality"; this factor is dominant.

A person with high scores on this factor is characterized as physically and mentally refined, prone to reflection, thinking about his mistakes and ways to avoid them.

It should be noted that the estimates for this factor in women are higher than in men, while they depend on the surrounding conditions and cultural level. Cattell defines this personality trait as "programmed emotional sensitivity", thereby emphasizing the prerogative of the genetic origin of this personality trait. It should be noted that men with high marks most often belong to the artistic type of personality. By occupation, high marks for this factor unite artists, actors, musicians, writers, diagnosticians and psychiatrists, and lawyers. Persons with I- are more prone to neurotic mismatches (in the study of the Eysenck test, these people have high scores on such a characteristic as neuroticism). In general, this factor determines the degree of emotional sophistication of the individual.

1-3 wall - practical, realistic, courageous, independent, has a sense of responsibility, but is skeptical about the subjective and cultural aspects of life. Sometimes ruthless, cruel, smug. Leading the group makes it work on a practical and realistic basis.
4th wall - strong, independent, self-reliant, realistic, does not tolerate meaninglessness.
7 walls - weak, dependent, insufficiently independent, helpless, sensitive.
8-10 walls - weak, dreamy, picky, capricious, feminine, sometimes demanding attention, help, dependent, impractical. Dislikes rough people and rough professions. Tends to slow down the activity of the group and violate its morale by unrealistic digging into the little things, the details.

9. Factor L: "gullibility - suspicion"
L- / 0-5 points L+ / 6-12 points
Openness, accommodating, tolerance, complaisance; freedom from envy, compliance. There may be a sense of insignificance. Caution, self-centeredness, wariness towards people; a tendency to jealousy, the desire to lay responsibility for mistakes on the environment, irritability. Sometimes autonomy, independence and independence in social behavior.
Cattell named this factor alaxia (L-) - protensia (L+). The term protensia means "protection" and "internal tension"; high scores on this factor may correlate with neurotic characteristics. At the same time, high scores on this factor are often found among people of independent behavior, among those who, by occupation, are associated with the creation of something, for example, in the field of religion and science. A number of character traits that are attributed to dominance (factor E) should in fact be associated with this factor. Pole L- characterizes a person who is good-natured, open and, perhaps, without ambition and striving for victory.

In general, the factor L reflects the emotional attitude towards people. Very high scores for this factor indicate excessive protection and emotional tension, frustration of the individual. The low pole (L-) characterizes a person who is good-natured, but prone to conformism.

1-3 wall - prone to freedom from the tendency of jealousy, adaptable, cheerful, does not strive for competition, cares about others. Works well in a group.
4th wall - trusting, adaptable, non-jealous, accommodating.
7 walls - suspicious, having his own opinion, not amenable to deception.
8-10 walls - incredulous, doubting, often immersed in his "I", stubborn, interested in the inner mental life. Cautious in actions, cares little about other people, does not work well in a group. This factor does not necessarily indicate paranoia.

10. Factor M: "practicality - daydreaming"
M- / 0-5 points M+ / 6-12 points
High speed of solving practical problems, prosaicness, orientation to external reality, developed concrete imagination, practicality, realism. Rich imagination, preoccupation with one’s ideas, internal illusions (“hovering in the clouds”), ease of rejection of practical judgments, ability to operate with abstract concepts, focus on one’s inner world; daydreaming.
The picture of this factor is quite complex. In general, individuals with M+ have a vibrant inner intellectual life, with intense living of ideas and feelings. In behavior they can be "bohemian", non-conformal. Artists, poets, researchers, experimenters, high-ranking leaders, editors, etc. have high marks for this factor. Persons engaged in mechanical calculations, where attention and concentration are needed, have low marks. It has also been noted that people with low scores on this factor are less likely to get into car accidents. They are characterized by balance and sanity. However, in unexpected situations, they often lack imagination and resourcefulness.

In general, the factor is focused on measuring the features of the imagination that are reflected in the real behavior of the individual, such as practicality, earthliness, or, conversely, some "head in the clouds", a romantic attitude to life.

1-3 Wall - Worries about doing the right thing, practical, guided by the possible, cares about details, retains presence of mind in extreme situations, but sometimes retains the imagination.
4th wall - practical, thorough, conventional. We manage external real circumstances.
7 walls - a person with a developed imagination, immersed in inner needs, takes care of practical matters. Bohemian.
8-10 walls - prone to unpleasant behavior for others (not everyday), unconventional, does not worry about everyday things, self-motivated, has a creative imagination. Pays attention to the "basic" and forgets about specific people and realities. Interests directed from within sometimes lead to unrealistic situations accompanied by expressive outbursts. Individuality leads to its rejection in group activity.

11. Factor N: "straightforwardness - diplomacy"
N- / 0-5 points N+ / 6-12 points

Frankness, simplicity, naivety, straightforwardness, tactlessness, naturalness, spontaneity, emotionality, indiscipline, inability to analyze the motives of a partner, lack of insight, simplicity of tastes, contentment with what is available. Sophistication, the ability to behave in society, diplomacy in communication, emotional restraint, insight, caution, cunning, aesthetic sophistication, sometimes unreliability, the ability to find a way out of difficult situations, prudence.
The factor is focused on measuring the relationship of the individual to people and the surrounding reality. So far, this factor has not been sufficiently studied. However, we can say that the factor characterizes a certain form of tactical skill of the individual (the factor positively correlates with mental abilities and dominance and with a certain self-doubt of the individual). High scores on this factor characterize diplomats as opposed to a "natural and straightforward" person with naive emotional sincerity, directness and ease. Cattell characterized people with high scores on the N factor as follows: "They can be either Socrates or a smart boy, and people with a low pole are distinguished by expressiveness, warmth and kindness."

There is evidence that people with low scores on this factor inspire more trust and sympathy, especially among children. People with high marks can be described as intelligent, independent, with a complex nature. In subcultural studies, a connection was found between high scores on this factor and the ability to survive and a certain sophistication. In terms of dynamic characteristics, people with high scores are leaders in analytical, purposeful discussion and in the formation of functional group decisions (theatrical directors, film directors, diplomats, as a rule, have high marks for this factor).

People with a low score on the N factor are slow, conservative, and prevent the group from making a decision.

Cattell figuratively called the positive pole the Machiavelli pole, and the negative pole the Rousseau pole.

1-3 wall - prone to lack of sophistication, to sentimentality and simplicity. Sometimes rude and harsh, usually natural and spontaneous.
4 wall - direct, natural, unsophisticated, sentimental.
7 walls - cunning, sloppy, secular, insightful (refined).
8-10 walls - refined, experienced, secular, cunning. Prone to analysis. An intellectual approach to assessing the situation, close to cynicism.

12. Factor O: "calmness - anxiety"
O- / 0-6 points O+ / 7-12 points
Carelessness, arrogance, cheerfulness, self-confidence and self-confidence, serenity, fearlessness, composure, calmness, lack of remorse and guilt. Anxiety, preoccupation, vulnerability, hypochondria, susceptibility to mood, fear, self-doubt, a tendency to premonitions, self-flagellation, depression, sensitivity to the approval of others, guilt and dissatisfaction with oneself.
Previously, when interpreting this factor, such terms as "depressive tendency", "bad mood", "self-abasement" and even "neurotic state" were used. Low scores are characteristic of people who "manage their failures." A person with high marks for this factor feels his instability, tension in difficult life situations, easily loses his presence of mind, is full of regrets and compassion; it is characterized by a combination of symptoms of hypochondria and neurasthenia with a predominance of fears. This factor is broader than guilt in the conventional sense. The stability component is also important in this factor; people with high scores are often shy, it is difficult for them to make contact with other people.

Low scores on this factor characterize those people who can cope with their failures, in contrast to those who experience failures as an internal conflict. There is evidence that antisocial individuals do not suffer from feelings of guilt.

By occupation, religious persons, artists, actors, and writers are highly rated for this factor. High scores largely determine successful leadership in difficult situations and a person's desire for self-actualization. At the same time, these assessments are characteristic of neurotics, alcoholics and people with certain types of psychopathy. Cattell believes that this factor can, within certain limits, be called the factor of Hamlet, and it can have a social and moral significance, which Dostoevsky's admirers intuitively feel. It should be taken into account that high scores for this factor may have a situational origin.

1-3 wall - serene, with a calm mood, it is difficult to piss him off, imperturbable. Confident in himself and his abilities. Flexible, does not feel threatened, sometimes to the point that he is not sensitive to the fact that the group is going a different way and that he can cause dislike.
4 wall - serene, trusting, calm.
7 walls - anxious, depressive, worried (tendency of autopunitiveness), guilt.
8-10 walls - depressive, bad mood prevails, gloomy forebodings and reflections, anxiety. Tendency to become anxious in difficult situations. Feeling not accepted by the group. A high score is common in clinical groups of all types.

13. Factor Q1: "conservatism - radicalism"
Q1- / 0-6 points Q1+ / 7-12 points
Conservatism, stability in relation to traditions, doubt in relation to new ideas and principles, a tendency to moralization and moralizing, resistance to change, narrowness of intellectual interests, orientation to specific real activities. Freethinking, experimentation, the presence of intellectual interests, developed analytical thinking, susceptibility to change, to new ideas, distrust of authorities, refusal to take anything on faith, focus on analytical, theoretical activity.
Studies have shown that individuals with high scores on this factor are better informed, less prone to moralizing, express more interest in science than in dogma. Moreover, they are ready to break habits and established traditions, they are characterized by independence of judgments, views and behavior.

The factor determines the radical, intellectual, political and religious attitudes.

High marks for this factor are observed among managers, administrators, scientists, university teachers, and especially among researchers and theorists. Low - among low-skilled specialists and service personnel (nannies, nurses, etc.).

There is an assumption that this factor has a genetic origin and in everyday consciousness correlates with such human characteristics as “smart” (Q1+) and “stupid” (Q1-). It is noteworthy that business leaders have high marks for this factor.

In the behavioral diagram, a person with low scores on this factor is characterized as a “conservative”, with high scores as a “radical”.

1-3 wall - convinced of the correctness of what he was taught, and accepts everything as verified, despite the contradictions. Prone to caution and compromise with new people. Tends to obstruct and resist change and delay it, sticks to tradition.
4th wall - conservative, respectful of principles, tolerant of traditional difficulties.
7 walls - experimental, critical, liberal, analytical, free-thinking.
8-10 walls - absorbed in intellectual problems, has doubts about various fundamental issues. He is skeptical and tries to get to the bottom of ideas old and new. He is often better informed, less inclined to moralize, more to experiment in life, tolerant of inconsistencies and changes.

14. Factor Q2: "conformism - non-conformism"
Q2- / 0-5 points Q2+ / 6-12 points
Dependence on the opinions and requirements of the group, sociability, following public opinion, the desire to work and make decisions together with other people, low independence, orientation towards social approval. Independence, orientation to one's own decisions, independence, resourcefulness, desire to have one's own opinion. With extreme high scores, the tendency to oppose oneself to the group and the desire to dominate it.
Low scores on this factor are sociable individuals, for whom the approval of society means a lot, these are secular people. People who are often disconnected from the group and by occupation are individualists have high marks - writers, scientists and criminals!

This factor is central to the second-order dependency-independence factor.

It should be especially taken into account that the indicators for this factor can characterize a certain sociability of the individual and have a constant connection with the criteria of real life.

In essence, Cattell believes that this factor is "thinking introversion" and both family and social traditions play a significant role in the formation of such a model of behavior. Such people are characterized by a rather high degree of awareness in choosing a line of behavior.

1-3 wall - prefers to work and make decisions together with other people, loves communication and admiration, depends on them. Inclined to go with a group. Not necessarily sociable, rather he needs support from the group.
4 wall - depending on the group, "joining", led, going to the call (group dependence).
7 walls - self-satisfied, offering his own solution, enterprising.
8-10 walls - independent, inclined to go his own way, make his own decisions, act independently. He does not consider public opinion, but does not necessarily play a dominant role in relation to others (see factor E). It cannot be assumed that he does not like people, he simply does not need their consent and support.

15. Factor Q3: "low self-control - high self-control"
Q3- / 0-5 points Q3+ / 6-12 points
Low discipline, indulgence follows one's desires, dependence on moods, inability to control one's emotions and behavior. Purposefulness, strong will, the ability to control their emotions and behavior.
Low scores on this factor indicate weak will and poor self-control. The activity of such people is disordered and impulsive. A person with high scores on this factor has socially approved characteristics: self-control, perseverance, conscientiousness, and a tendency to observe etiquette. In order to meet such standards, the individual requires the application of certain efforts, the presence of clear principles, beliefs and consideration of public opinion.

This factor measures the level of internal control of behavior, the integration of the individual.

People with high marks for this factor are prone to organizational activities and achieve success in those professions that require objectivity, determination, balance. The factor characterizes a person's awareness in regulating the power of the "I" (factor C) and the power of the "super-I" (factor G) and determines the severity of the volitional characteristics of the individual. This factor is one of the most important for predicting the success of the activity. It is positively associated with the frequency of leadership selection and the degree of activity in solving group problems.

1-3 wall - not guided by volitional control, does not pay attention to social requirements, is inattentive to others. May feel inadequate.
4 wall - internally undisciplined, conflict (low integration).
7 walls - controlled, socially accurate, following the "I"-image (high integration).
8-10 walls - tends to have a strong control of their emotions and general behavior. Socially attentive and thorough; exhibits what is commonly referred to as "self-respect" and concern for social reputation. Sometimes, however, it tends to be stubborn.

16. Factor Q4: "relaxation - tension."
Q4- / 0-7 points Q4+ / 8-12 points
Relaxation, lethargy, apathy, calmness, low motivation, excessive satisfaction, equanimity. Composure, energy, tension, frustration, increased motivation, anxiety, agitation, irritability.
A high score (9-12 points) is interpreted as energetic excitation, which requires a certain discharge; sometimes this condition can turn into a psychosomatic disorder: emotional stability decreases, balance is disturbed, aggressiveness may appear. Such people rarely become leaders.

Studies have shown that a low score (0-5 points) is typical for people with a low level of achievement motivation, content with what they have. Persons with values ​​of this factor from 5 to 8 points are characterized by optimal emotional tone and stress tolerance.

1-3 wall - prone to relaxation, balance, satisfaction. In some situations, his oversatisfaction can lead to laziness, to the achievement of low results. On the contrary, a high level of stress can interfere with the effectiveness of study or work.
4 wall - relaxed (not tense), not frustrated.
7 walls - tense, frustrated, motivated, hyper-reactive (high energy stress).
8-10 walls - prone to tension, excitability.

17. Factor MD: "adequate self-esteem - inadequate self-esteem."
MD- / 0-4 points MD+ /10-14 points
Dissatisfaction with oneself, self-doubt, excessive self-criticism. Overestimation of their capabilities, self-confidence and self-satisfaction.
The MD factor is additional to the main 16 and is highlighted in the Cattell personality technique for forms C and D. The average values ​​of this factor (from 5 to 9 points) characterize the adequacy of a person's self-assessment, its certain maturity. For the researcher, the data on this factor are of great importance, since they help to assess the maturity of the individual, and can also be used in individual work with the subject.

Description of the secondary factors of the Cattell test:

F1. Anxiety.

Low scores - in general, this person is satisfied with what he has and can achieve what he thinks is important. However, very low scores may indicate a lack of motivation in difficult situations.

High scores - a high level of anxiety in its usual sense. Anxiety is not necessarily neurotic, as it can be situationally conditioned. However, in some ways it has incapacity, because a person is dissatisfied to a degree that does not allow him to fulfill the requirements and achieve what he wants. Very high anxiety usually interferes with productivity and leads to physical disorders.

F2. Extraversion - introversion.

Low scores - a tendency to dryness, to self-satisfaction, frozen interpersonal contacts. This can be beneficial in work that requires precision.

High scores - social contact, uninhibited, successfully establishes and maintains interpersonal relationships. This can be a very favorable moment in situations requiring this type of temperament. This feature should always be considered a favorable prognosis in activities, for example, in studies.

F3. Sensitivity.

Low scores - a tendency to experience difficulties in connection with the emotionality manifested in everything. These people may be dissatisfied and frustrated. However, there is a sensitivity to the nuances of life. There are probably artistic inclinations and softness. If such a person has a problem, then it takes a lot of thought to resolve it before taking action.

High scores - enterprising, decisive and flexible personality. This person tends to ignore the nuances of life, directing his behavior to be too obvious and obvious. If difficulties arise, they cause rapid action without sufficient thought.

F4. conformity.

Low scores - dependent on the group, a passive person who needs the support of others and orients his behavior in the direction of the people who provide such support.

High scores - aggressive, independent, courageous, sharp personality. Tries to choose situations where such behavior is at least tolerated. Shows great initiative.

Interpretation of Cattell test results:

Socio-psychological features: extraversion - introversion.
A-, F-, H-

Restraint in interpersonal contacts, difficulties in direct and social communication, a tendency to individual work, isolation, focus on one's inner world. Introversion.

A-, F+, H-
Restraint in establishing both interpersonal and social contacts. In behavior - expressiveness, impulsiveness, shyness and external activity, a tendency to individual activity, a tendency to introversion are manifested in the character.

Openness in interpersonal contacts, the ability to communicate directly, restraint and prudence in establishing social contacts, caution and shyness.

Openness in interpersonal contacts, activity, sociability, readiness to join new groups, restraint and prudence in choosing communication partners. Tendency to extroversion.

Restraint in direct interpersonal contacts, activity, expressiveness in social communication, readiness to join new groups, a tendency to leadership. Tendency to extroversion.

Restraint and prudence in establishing interpersonal contacts, activity in the social sphere, business leadership can manifest itself.

Openness, expressiveness, impulsiveness in interpersonal communication. Difficulty in establishing social contacts, manifestation of shyness in new, unfamiliar circumstances, difficulties in making social decisions.

Openness, sociability, activity in establishing both interpersonal and social contacts. The behavior manifests expressiveness, impulsiveness, social courage, propensity to take risks, readiness to join new groups, to be a leader. Oriented outwards, towards people. Extraversion.

Socio-psychological features: communicative properties.

E+, Q2+, G+, N+, L+

Independence of character, a tendency to dominance, authoritarianism, alertness towards people, opposing oneself to a group, a tendency to leadership, a developed sense of responsibility and duty, acceptance of rules and norms, independence in decision-making, initiative, activity in social spheres, flexibility and diplomacy in interpersonal communication, the ability to find non-trivial solutions in practical, everyday situations.

E-, Q2+, L+, N+, G+

Softness and suppleness are manifested in the character. These features are compensated in social behavior by opposing oneself to a group, alertness towards people, flexibility and diplomacy in communication, a developed sense of duty and responsibility, and the adoption of generally accepted moral rules and norms.

E+, Q2-, G+, L+, N+

Independence of character, alertness towards people, flexibility and diplomacy in communication, manifestation of conformal reactions, submission to the requirements and opinion of the group, acceptance of generally accepted moral rules and norms, striving for leadership and dominance (authoritarianism) as a manifestation of conformity.

E+, Q2-, G+, L-, N+

Independence of character, openness, diplomacy towards people, acceptance of generally accepted rules and norms, a developed sense of duty and responsibility Submission to the requirements and opinion of the group, the ability to make independent and original decisions in both intellectual and everyday situations.

E+, Q2-, G+, L-, N-

Independence in making intellectual decisions, openness and straightforwardness in relation to people, manifestation of conformity, acceptance of generally accepted moral rules and norms, a developed sense of duty and responsibility, submission to the requirements and opinion of the group.

E+, L-, Q2+, G+, N+

Independence of character, openness and diplomacy towards people, a developed sense of duty and responsibility, acceptance of generally accepted moral rules and norms, a tendency to leadership, dominance (authoritarianism), confidence in social situations.

E+, L-, N+, Q2+, G-

Independence of character, manifestation of nonconformal reactions, free attitude to generally accepted rules and norms, a tendency to oppose oneself to a group, autonomy in social behavior, some irresponsibility, a tendency to violate traditions, make extraordinary decisions in relation to people - openness, gullibility, diplomacy (at a high level intelligence can be assumed to have a high creative potential of the individual).

E+, Q2-, L-, G-, N-

Independence of character, manifested in a free attitude to generally accepted moral rules and norms, not expressed by a sense of duty and responsibility. Conformal reactions are noted in behavior, dependence on the opinions and requirements of the group, openness and straightforwardness in relation to people, some social immaturity.

E+, Q2-, G-, L+, N+

Independence of character, alertness and insight towards people, dependence on the group and public opinion, conformity and some social immaturity. There may be neurotic reactions (with low scores on the MD factor and high scores on the O factor).

E+, L-, Q2-,G+, N-

Independence of character, in relation to people - openness, gullibility and straightforwardness. A developed sense of duty, responsibility, adherence to generally accepted rules and norms, dependence on the opinions and requirements of the group. In extreme situations, dominance can manifest itself.

E+, L+, Q2-, G+, N-

Independence of character, alertness towards people, straightforwardness. In the social sphere, conformal reactions are manifested, dependence on the opinions and requirements of the group, adherence to generally accepted moral rules and norms, some social dependence, independence is manifested in motivation and a sense of duty and responsibility.

E-, L-, Q2-, N-, G-

Gentleness, pliability and openness, adherence to the opinion and requirement of the group, straightforwardness and gullibility in relation to people, a free attitude to generally accepted moral rules and norms. Conformity of behavior, social dependence and immaturity are noted.

E- , L+, Q2+,N+, G+

The natural softness and pliability of character is compensated by a wary attitude towards people, the desire for independence and opposing oneself to the group. Full acceptance of generally accepted moral rules and norms, diplomacy and insight in dealing with people. Possible business leadership.

E-, L+, Q2-, N+, G+

Softness, pliability, wariness, diplomacy, worldly insight are noted in relation to people. Social behavior is characterized by conformal reactions, adherence to generally accepted moral rules and norms, dependence on the opinions and requirements of the group, lack of independence in decision-making.

E-, L-, Q2+, N+, G+

Gentleness, pliability towards people, open and insightful. In a small group - the desire for independence, some opposition to the group. Developed sense of duty and responsibility, acceptance of generally accepted moral rules and norms. Perhaps the manifestation of strong-willed qualities and some desire for leadership.

E-, L- , Q2-, N+, G+

Softness, suppleness, pliability. In relation to people - openness and insight. In social behavior, it is distinguished by conformism, dependence on the opinions and requirements of the group, the adoption of generally accepted moral rules and norms, lack of independence and indecision in decision-making.

E-, L-, Q2+, N-, G+

Softness, pliability, openness and straightforwardness. In small groups, there is a desire for independence and independence. Developed sense of duty and responsibility, acceptance of generally accepted moral rules and norms.

E-, L+, N-, Q2-, G+

Softness, pliability, ingenuity, but there is a wariness towards people. In social behavior - conformity, dependence on the opinion of the group, the adoption of generally accepted moral rules and norms, lack of independence in decision-making.

E-, L+, N+, Q2-, G+

Softness, pliability, in relation to people - alertness and insight. In social behavior - conformity, a developed sense of duty and responsibility, the adoption of generally accepted moral rules and norms, the ability to find the right way out of difficult everyday situations.

E-, L+, N-, Q2+, G+

Softness, pliability, straightforwardness, in a small group, the desire for independence, to oppose oneself in relation to it. Alertness towards people, a developed sense of duty and responsibility.

E-, L-, N-, Q2+, G-

Softness, gullibility, pliability, straightforwardness. In social behavior, nonconformal reactions are noted: opposing oneself to a group, a free attitude to generally accepted moral rules and norms. One can assume personal and social immaturity.

E-, L-, N+, Q2+, G-

Gentleness, openness, in relation to people - insight, diplomacy. In social behavior, nonconformity: independence from the opinion of the group, freedom from the pressure of generally accepted moral rules and norms, a tendency to independence.

E-, L+, N-, Q2+, G+

Softness, in relation to people - alertness, straightforwardness, the desire to oppose oneself to the group. Developed sense of duty and responsibility, acceptance of generally accepted moral rules and norms, striving for leadership.

Emotional characteristics of personality.

C+, O-, Q3+, Q4-, (L-, G+)

Emotional stability, confidence in oneself and one's abilities, calm adequate perception of reality, the ability to control one's emotions and behavior, resistance to stress. In behavior - balance, focus on reality. (Low scores on the L factor confirm calm adequacy; high scores on the G factor together with the Q3 factor emphasize the development of volitional qualities.)

C-, O+, Q3-, Q4+, (L+)

Emotional instability, increased anxiety: self-doubt, suspiciousness, low stress resistance, excessive emotional tension, frustration, low control of emotions and behavior, impulsivity, affectivity, dependence on moods. The combination of factors O+, Q4+, L+ indicates a neurotic anxiety syndrome, a focus on resolving internal conflicts.

C+, O+, Q3-, Q4+ (L+)

Strong nervous system, natural emotional stability. Decreased volitional activity, increased anxiety, suspiciousness, low control of emotions and behavior, dependence on moods, frustration, low stress resistance. In external behavior, it can give the impression of a fairly balanced person (impulsivity manifests itself in stressful situations). In a combination of O +, Q4 +, L + - a neurotic anxiety syndrome is diagnosed, a focus on resolving internal conflicts.

C-, O-, Q3+, Q4-

Emotional plasticity, genetic instability, tendency to impulsiveness. These properties are compensated by developed volitional regulation: the ability to control one's emotions and behavior, self-confidence, stress resistance. In behavior - balance, focus on reality, emotionally flexible.

C-, O-, Q3-, Q4-, (N-)

Emotional plasticity, genetic instability of emotions (biological dependence), low volitional regulation: inability to control one's emotions and behavior, dependence on moods, impulsiveness, efficiency. It can also be stress resistant. In a combination of N- and Q4- (0-6), O- they diagnose low motivation, self-satisfaction, inner relaxation. Low efficiency in professional activities.

C+, O-, Q3-, Q4-, (N-)

Genetic emotional stability (biological dependence), self-confidence, calm adequate perception of reality, such a person does not need volitional regulation of his emotions and behavior, is stress-resistant, rigid. In behavior can be balanced, calm. Low scores on factors N, O, Q4 suggest low motivation, self-satisfaction, inner relaxation (lack of efficiency in professional activities).

C+, O+, Q3+, Q4-, (N+)

Genetic emotional stability, high control of emotions and behavior, stress resistance, a certain dissatisfaction with oneself, some dissatisfaction, which ensures the desire for self-actualization (with high scores on the N factor, one can assume an overestimated level of claims) In behavior - balanced, stable, striving for reality and social success.

C-, O+, Q3+, Q4-, (G+, I+)

Genetic emotional instability (biological dependence), plasticity of the nervous system, increased anxiety, self-doubt, doubts and suspiciousness, however, high self-regulation, control of emotions and behavior, stress resistance, behavior can be impulsive. With average scores for factor G and high scores for factor I, one can make an assumption about the creative potential of the individual and her artistic type.

C+, O+, Q3+, Q4-, (G+, I+)

Genetic emotional stability (biological dependence). Developed volitional component high self-regulation, control of emotions and behavior, resistance to stress - provides balance in behavior, characterizes the emotional maturity of the individual, the ability to be a leader. Average scores for factor G and high scores for factor I suggest the presence of creative potential and the assignment of a person to an artistic type.

C-, O-, Q3-, Q4+

Genetic emotional instability, low control of emotions and behavior characterize unbalanced behavior, impulsiveness, dependence on moods, in extreme situations - frustration, stress resistance. At the same time, self-confidence, a calm perception of reality, self-satisfaction are noted. You can make an assumption about the immaturity of the emotional sphere of personality.

C+, O+, Q3-, Q4-

Genetic emotional stability, low control of emotions and behavior, low self-regulation give rise to self-doubt, doubts and suspiciousness, dissatisfaction with oneself. However, in extreme situations, natural qualities are manifested that provide stress resistance and sufficient balance of behavior. Emotional-volitional immaturity of the personality is noted.

C+, O-, Q3+, Q4+

Genetic stability, high self-regulation, control of emotions and behavior provide balance, inner self-confidence and self-confidence, a calm perception of reality, but there may be low situational stress tolerance, excessive emotional tension, but this only applies to complex significant situations and can be controlled. The person is emotionally mature.

C+, O+, Q3+, Q4+, (N+, L+)

Genetic emotional stability, highly developed control of emotions and behavior, a pronounced volitional component and self-regulation ensure a balanced behavior. However, internal dissatisfaction with oneself, suspiciousness and some anxiety give rise to frustration and low stress resistance. With high scores on the factors N and L, we can talk about a certain neurotic syndrome and an overestimated level of claims.

Programmed emotional sensitivity, refinement, richness of emotional experiences, a wide emotional palette, developed imagination, a tendency to daydreaming, reflection, dissatisfaction with oneself, increased anxiety and intuitiveness. The focus on one's inner world, the artistic type of personality and anxiety as a property of the personality are diagnosed.

Low sensitivity, some emotional flatness, rationality, practicality, self-confidence, calm adequacy in the perception of reality, poise and stability in behavior, focus on specific practical activities (pragmatism) and reality.

High sensitivity, emotional refinement, wide emotional palette. Self-confidence, calm perception of reality, focus on solving specific practical problems (pragmatism) are noted. In men, high scores on factor I indicate an artistic personality type High sensitivity, emotional refinement, richness of the emotional palette, a tendency to reflection, dissatisfaction with oneself, increased anxiety. Concrete imagination, orientation to reality. With low scores on factors L and Q4, high anxiety (factor O) is interpreted as a personality trait and therefore, when combined with I +, it can characterize the artistic type of personality.

Low sensitivity, some emotional flatness. Developed imagination, a tendency to daydreaming, reflection, dissatisfaction with oneself, susceptibility to doubt, the desire for self-improvement, the search for incentives for imagination. Focus on one's inner world, low pragmatism in behavior, difficulties in solving practical problems.

I-, M-, O+, (N+, Q4+)

Low sensitivity, some emotional flatness, pragmatism, focus on objective reality, adherence to earthly principles. At the same time, personality is characterized by dissatisfaction with oneself, self-doubt. (At high scores on N and Q4 factors, a neurotic syndrome can be diagnosed).

I-, M+, O- (N+)

Low sensitivity, some emotional flatness, calm perception of reality, self-confidence and self-confidence, a certain complacency. Such a person has a developed imagination, can turn his dreams into reality, is oriented towards reality and is quite enterprising. (High scores on the factor N emphasize the practical entrepreneurial spirit of the individual).

I+, M-, O+, (L+, Q4+)

High sensitivity emotional refinement, intuitiveness, reflexivity, dissatisfaction with oneself, self-doubt, focus on one's inner world. Such a person has a specific imagination, an orientation towards earthly principles, but high anxiety does not give him the opportunity to be enterprising and decisive. With a combination of high scores on factors O, L and Q4, a neurotic anxiety syndrome is diagnosed.

Intellectual characteristics of personality.

B+, M+, Q1+, (E+)

Efficiency, mobility of thinking, a high level of general culture, the ability to operate with abstractions, developed analyticity, developed intellectual interests, the desire for new knowledge, a tendency to free thought, radicalism, high erudition, breadth of views. (With high scores on factor E, independence and originality in solving intellectual problems are noted).

B+, M-,Q1+, (E+)

Efficiency, mobility of thinking, high level of general culture, developed analyticity, interest in intellectual new knowledge, striving for free thinking, radicalism, high erudition, breadth of views. Concrete imagination, focus on solving specific intellectual problems Harmonious development of the intellect. (With high scores on factor E, independence and originality in solving intellectual problems are noted).

B+, M+, Q1+, (N+), (E+)

Efficiency, mobility of thinking, a high level of general culture, developed analyticity, interest in intellectual knowledge, striving for free thinking, radicalism. Ability to operate with abstractions, developed imagination. With high scores on the N factor, the ability to translate abstract concepts into practical implementation (a quality necessary for a leader). With high scores on the factor E - a tendency to independent original solutions. Harmonious development of intelligence.

B+, M+, Q1-, (E+)

Efficiency, mobility of thinking, a high level of general culture, erudition. Ability to operate with abstractions, developed imagination. Criticality and conservatism in the adoption of the new, reduced intellectual interests, low analytical thinking. (With high scores on the factor E - the tendency to make independent, extraordinary intellectual decisions.)

B+, M-, Q1-, (N+)

Efficiency, mobility of thinking, a high level of general culture, erudition. Such a person has a specific imagination, criticality and conservatism in accepting the new, is aimed at specific practical thinking. (High scores for the N factor characterize the focus on practical activities.)

B-, M+, Q1+, (E+)

Low efficiency of thinking, insufficiently developed general culture. Such a person has a developed analytical thinking, intellectual interests, the ability to operate with abstract concepts, and a developed imagination. (High scores on factor E indicate a tendency to make independent original intellectual decisions). Low scores for factor B with this combination of factors can be explained by a number of reasons, insufficient level of education; low stress resistance, frustration, situational anxiety (reduced efficiency in the implementation of knowledge); poor physical health at the time of the test.

B-, M-, Q1+, (E+, N+)

Low efficiency of thinking, insufficiently developed general level of culture, erudition (possibly due to frustration or a low level of education). Such a person has a developed analytical thinking, intellectual interests, a tendency to free-thinking, radicalism. There is a specific imagination. (With high scores on the factor E - the tendency to make independent original intellectual decisions; on the factor N - developed practical intelligence.)

B-, M+, Q1-, (E+, N+)

Low efficiency of thinking, low level of general culture and erudition, criticality and conservatism in accepting the new, reduced interest in new intellectual knowledge. Such a person has a developed imagination, the ability to operate with abstractions - this property affects such a personality trait as daydreaming. The solution of intellectual problems is difficult. High scores on factors E and N compensate for the difficulties in making intelligent everyday decisions. A high score on the E factor and a low score on the N factor characterize a tendency to dominance and conservative stubbornness.

Low efficiency of thinking, inability to update one's knowledge, low general culture and erudition, conservatism and criticalness in accepting new intellectual knowledge, reduced intellectual interests, concreteness of imagination, focus on practical, concrete activity. (High scores on factors E and N do not affect the intellectual, but exacerbate the negative personality traits: dominance, worldly resourcefulness, stubbornness.)

Self-esteem.

MD-
MD=0-3

Low self-esteem, overly critical attitude towards oneself, dissatisfaction with oneself, rejection of oneself.

Adequate self-esteem, knowledge of oneself and one's qualities, self-acceptance (indicator of personal maturity).

MD+
MD = 9-14

Inflated self-esteem, uncritical attitude towards oneself, acceptance of oneself and one's qualities (indicator of personal immaturity).

MD, G+, Q3+, C+, M-
MD=4-8

Adequate self-esteem, social normativity, emotionally significant responsibility of behavior, self-discipline, self-control of emotions and behavior, emotional stability and concreteness of imagination form a symptom complex that characterizes self-regulation and maturity of the individual.